What is YOUR SAT score and Unweighted GPA?

Test Preparation
81

<p>2140/3.3</p>

<p>I don't believe there really is a correlation.</p>

82

<p>Of course there is no correlation...different schools have different systems. Some give out A grades like candy and others make you work for them very, very, very hard to get them.</p>

83

<p>1680/3.97 (bad score, i know)</p>

84

<p>1930/4.0 Salutatorian o yea......and yet I dont have a 2400 surprise surprise</p>

85

<p>2270/3.7381</p>

<p>Currently ranked 20/367</p>

86

<p>2230/3.71ish</p>

87

<p>GPA: 3.4</p>

<p>SAT: 1780</p>

<p>math-610 writing-610 reading- 560</p>

88

<p>1910/3.87...</p>

89

<p>2070/3.5 (10 char).</p>

90

<p>Here's mine: SAT it stinks 2050/4.0</p>

91

<p>2090 with a 93.4 GPA ... </p>

<p>I'm trying to get a 2300 with the latest one.</p>

92

<p>"gpa is only as concrete as the individual's school curriculum. honestly, i feel that this thread will not produce any relevant information. the sat measures natural intelligence, and gpa measures how much you care about your studies. as a result, if i were a college admissions rep, i'd take high sat/low gpa combos with much caution. "</p>

<p>pretty much true - altho there are always exceptions</p>

<p>gpa 3.5
sat: 2130 (1400)</p>

<p>and i think i just got 2200 on my retake</p>

93

<p>Rigor of academics? Grade inflation?
What would you want schools to think when they compare 2320/4.0 (post #80) with 2050/4.0 (post #90)? </p>

<p>2360/3.87</p>

94

<p>What about people who take harder classes? Those classes are more likely to weigh down GPA, so comparing SAT scores to the GPA from harder classes may not be reasonable.</p>

95

<p>sat 2230, gpa 4.0</p>

96

<p>2000 Sat/29 Act/3.95 Gpa</p>

97

<p>sat-1770/ gpa-3.6</p>

98

<p>Sat- 2240 Gpa- 4.0</p>

99

<p>This is pretty pointless. As a previous poster so aptly noted, high schools differ in grading policy and difficulty. For instance, my school has a hardcore policy (A=95% and above, A-=90-94%). So, my stats are as follows:</p>

<p>GPA-3.84
SAT-2320</p>

<p>If my school eliminated A-'s, I'd have a 4.00...The courses at my school are really difficult as well. For instance, I took 4 AP's as a junior and that's considered suicide (most people take 2-3 in a year and mostly easy ones at that; I took Calc BC, Chem, Eng, and Comp Sci). By comparison, a kid from our school took 4 AP's in total before the 12th grade, 2 as a junior, 2 as a sophomore (I took 5 including Physics B as a frosh); that same kid went to gov school and is now applying to Stanford. So yeah...this whole concept means nothing. Every school is viewed from a different angle by adcoms. What I like to believe is that every student's achievements are given due credit (even though that's probably not entirely the case). <em>shrug</em></p>

100

<p>SAT score and ranking may be more strongly correlated. Still, some people come from schools with few high-achievers.</p>