What to choose MEng vs MS Degree?

<p>Hey everyone,</p>

<p>I hope everyone else's process of applying went well.
I am in a bit of a conundrum in what to choose for graduate school.</p>

<p>Basically, I have two options</p>

<ol>
<li>UC Berkeley - Masters of Engineering Degree in Material Science</li>
<li>UC Irvine- Masters of Science Degree in Material Science</li>
</ol>

<p>I am wondering which one to accept. Some things to keep in mind:</p>

<ol>
<li>I do not want to pursue a pHd</li>
<li>I am more naturally inclined to industry and practicals over theory</li>
</ol>

<p>My main issue I have is which degree is considered to be more prestigious in industry. Many companies from what I've heard do not recognize the Masters of Engineering Degree. However, UCB is more recognized than UCI. </p>

<p>I am leaning more towards UCB based on my interests and the name-brand associated with the school. However, I will be forking out more $$ (1 year @ $43k vs 2 years @ $32k total) and am a bit concerned if I can't find a job with a MEng.</p>

<p>What are your thoughts?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Who told you that? I’ve never seen a case where a M.Eng was ignored. A M.Eng is treated as identical to a M.S. in practice unless you’re interviewing for research positions (R&D or PhD programs). Keep in mind that many M.S. programs are coursework-only and some M.Eng programs require a thesis. </p>

<p>Given your preference for industry and the prestige of Berkeley, I would recommend the M.Eng program.</p>

<p>Recruiters don’t really give any importance to the degree name. They look at core courses taken, projects participated in and skills acquired.</p>

<p>An MEng from Berkeley is a fantastic opportunity. Reminds me of the Cornell MEng degree which brings recruiters to Cornell in droves.</p>