What would be a good fit for me?

@momrath , I admit that this is a difficult thing to substantiate based on admission statistics, because colleges do not release the figures that would be necessary to make the determination.

But just in terms of my own thinking, I tend to think of the presence of Pathway programs as a proxy for the willingness to allot space in undergraduate programs to somewhat-less-qualified internationals who can pay full fare. (This in contrast to the institutions where the only way standards are relaxed at all is for recruited athletes and/or legacy/donor applicants.)

It’s not that I think there’s anything wrong with these programs, especially when the premise is to bolster the English skills of otherwise-qualified applicants. But a closer look shows that many of the Pathway programs are marketed explicitly, not just to students who need language study, but to students with academic weaknesses as well.

Now, it may be that this alternate route is the only way in for less-than-stellar international applicants, and that the normal application process is every bit as competitive for internationals as for domestic applicants, or more so. But in my mind, if the institution is building or subcontracting whole programs for the purpose of attracting foreign dollars, it would stand to reason that the regular admissions process might also tip in favor of borderline applicants who offer those same dollars. Not to any egregious extent, I’m sure… just akin to what the UC system does with high-paying, out-of-state applicants; there’s simply a higher level of competition for in-state spots because of the lower price point, resulting in a small but measurable difference in stat averages. Just on the face of it, there’s no reason I can think of why that would not be the case for at least some subset of the colleges that rely on full-pay international dollars from 20% or more of their students, in order to balance their books and maintain the level of need-based and merit aid that they provide to domestic applicants. I guess I could be wrong; I just don’t see why I would be.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/01/04/colleges-create-pathways-for-foreign-students/8swya1bsYkxfKKPOL2p4DL/story.html#comments

https://www.kaplanpathways.com/universities/
https://www.internationalstudent.com/pathway/pathway-programs-to-consider/

Thanks, @aquapt, for your thoughts on Pathway programs. I’m going to have to study these links more carefully.

I live in a developing country and have observed that there are two co-existing streams in international admissions: Poor, high-achieving students may receive substantial aid from top colleges but the outcome is unpredictable.
Rich full pay students can be accepted to schools with a wide range of selectivity.

I wish colleges would be more transparent on their acceptance data so that international families (especially the poor ones) would know what the odds really are.

@gandalf78 I am not visiting any of the schools till after I apply, but thank you for your comment

@aquapt @momrath Thank you both, I shall look into the pathways program further and consider my options.

@momrath @aquapt @momprof9904 When I further looked into niche, it showed me the statistics and my chances of getting in in my preferred major with out of state admissions. I can’t verify if these statistics are accurate or not, but that’s how I based my classification and I understand that it only takes into account the stats of the students who voluntarily enter them but I felt like it might have been a good estimate.

Having said that, I will take all of your opinions into account and see what changes I should make.

@momrath I will be applying as an international.