<p>
</p>
<p>Tech really isn’t that difficult. The issue is more the competition for students. For instance, consider a student who has been one of the top students in his high school for the past 4 years and who never studies because things come natural to him. Now move that student to Tech, where every student was at the top of their high school class and extremely intelligent - basically someone who went from one of the top to average.</p>
<p>That student can do one of two things: (1) not study and fall behind, or (2) work hard and get back to the top. Tech has a reputation for being difficult because if a student chooses path #1, there’s no outlet. At other students, someone could transfer to Hotel Management or Communications or some other “easy major” and get back to being a top student with little effort. But at Tech, all majors are difficult, and there’s no easy way out. If you decide to not work, you either leave, fail out, or graduate with a low GPA and no job.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It depends on your definition of exciting. Tech really lacks the “fun electives” of other colleges: bowling, archery, Philosophy of the Simpsons, etc. Most students take Physics or Psychology as electives. And to some degree, this is a moot point since most Tech degrees have little room for free electives. </p>
<p>Regardless, there are plenty of motivating opportunities around campus. Tech has the most preeminent Co-Op / Internship program in the country that will allow a student to earn good money ($20-$30/hr) while gaining real world experience. Tech has excellent undergraduate research opportunities - as good or better than all other peer universities.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You’ll get a mix. In chemical engineering, for instance, you could have a socially awkward guy who don’t look at the class when he teaches or a professor that is literally a stand up comedian. And that’s for the same class. </p>
<p>At any research school, though, you’ll find professors hired for research prestige rather than teaching ability. That doesn’t mean that they’re bad educators - at a top research university, you will take classes from the people that invented theory, wrote the books you study, and that can add the latest state-of-the-art knowledge to a topic. At a teaching university, you’ll have an instructor who is more personable, but has knowledge of a topic that is 20 years old (or however long it’s been since he or she was in his or her doctorate program). </p>
<p>In addition, teaching professors usually don’t understand a topic as thoroughly as the research experts in the field - not only because of lack of experience, but because the “top students” from a PhD program pursue research careers, usually (it pays more, is more prestigious, and offers a better lifestyle).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Both. That mostly depends on the kid.</p>