<p>Whats a 33 in terms of SAT score?</p>
<p>2190-2200 approx.</p>
<p>mattw where'd u get that info from?</p>
<p>according to this, it's a 2220-2270</p>
<p>yeah I agree with bicycle, it's a mid-2200</p>
<p>Holy mother **** that kills my 2010 SAT</p>
<p>The Wikipedia comparison isn't accurate. The source for it leads simply to UC eligibility. Try this: Estimated</a> Relationship between ACT Composite Score and SAT CR+M+W Score</p>
<p>wow I know people who arent even that smart get 30+ on this thing with only a bit of practice. Getting a 2200 on SAT is 10x more skillful then getting a 33 on ACT.</p>
<p>Well it depends on the school..none of those are accurate, really. If you are planning on a UC, like UC Berkeley you can use the eligibility index calculator. I calcluated my 28 and it is about equivalent to a 1920 SAT.</p>
<p>That is the problem with the SAT, study like 15 hours and get a 2200. SAT is all about studying the test</p>
<p>Great. Because I am only applying to UCs</p>
<p>Yeah the SAT is usually all about how anal you are with studying for tests. I KNOW I could get a 2200 is i studied like some people do.</p>
<p>Yeah, fortify try it out. Once you get your UC index total, then divide that by three and see what SAT correlates with that number.</p>
<p>@BHadoC
You can't really say anything about getting that 2200. Some people just don't do as well on the SAT even with studying a lot.</p>
<p>Basically what he is trying to say is that both tests are different. Some people do better on the ACT others do better on the SAT</p>
<p>bicyclekick, here's the site i used SAT</a> vs. ACT Scores </p>
<p>also, i know someone who got a 2350 SAT and a 32 ACT so it does really depend on the person.</p>