<p>2080 vs. 33. </p>
<p>I'm just gonna submit the ACT score to colleges, and am definitely not taking a reasoning test of any sort every again!</p>
<p>1910 vs. 28</p>
<p>Looks like my SAT is a little bit higher. Might just submit both to colleges.</p>
<p>So for all of you whose ACT score is much better than your SAT, mine's 36 vs. 2180, are you planning on retaking the SAT? Or is there really no need to do that even if college will see it due to SAT IIs?</p>
<p>35 vs. 2270</p>
<p>as for IWA's answer, I would say don't retake the SAT. Colleges will look at your highest score (ACT), and you'd be better off spending your time studying for SAT IIs.</p>
<p>33 vs. 1340/2030</p>
<p>Thank heavens above for the ACT.</p>
<p>36 vs 2240</p>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree with KMad.</p>
<p>ouch... i feel hurt. 30 v. 2000
math 590 v. 36
reading 700 v. 31
english 710 v. 36
science 28
(no essay score yet...)</p>
<p>1940 vs. 28</p>
<p>pretty much the same.... damnitt.</p>
<p>Wait, just out of curiosity...it seems like some people did really well on the SAT and ACT (there was a 2360/36, and a couple other really high scores). Did people just take them at the same time or did they take just take both tests to see if they could score similarly?</p>
<p>Is it worth it to take the ACT once, just to see? And if you got high scores in both, would you send both in, or does that make you look anal?</p>
<p>Sat: 2240
Act: 35</p>
<p>2040 vs. 35</p>
<p>SAT = :|
ACT = :)</p>
<p>SAT: 2150 = meh
ACT: 35 = yay!</p>
<p>SAT: 1900
ACT: 32</p>
<p>Although there is a five month difference between the two scores.</p>
<p>see, that is so weird. A whole bunch of you got similar/higher ACT scores than I did, but lower SAT scores. I always thought they were pretty correspondent - I got a 2330 and a 35. According to the chart, a 35 = 2340, which means my scores were very similar. So it's strange to see 2150 35, or 2040 35, or 2240 36's and scores like that, because there is little correlation. I mean there are the 2360 - 36ers and 2350 35ers, and that seems to correlate a little bit better. But for the rest of you: Is act that much easier for you guys?</p>
<p>Btw, I'm not trying to demean anyone's scores, I just want to figure out why there is such a gap and why for most people here...</p>
<p>33 vs. 2210</p>
<p>They basically correlate.</p>
<p>36 vs 2100 </p>
<p>They dont correlate.</p>
<p>I was getting 2300s+ on like 15+ practice exams, but the actual SAT always seemed harder.</p>
<p>T-san: the gap would probably be because the ACT is more straightforward and academic oriented</p>
<p>35 ACT vs. 2070 SAT</p>
<p>they don't match at all.... i don't like the SAT anyway</p>
<p>1910
29 Act</p>
<p>2040
34</p>
<p>I didn't like the SAT... I found the ACT to be a much friendlier test</p>
<p>2250 vs 35</p>