<h2>Can we stop with any hostilities? Parts of this thread are like my Facebook friends all decided to jump on CC… I’m a USC student who was raised on SEC football. </h2>
<h2>On the abbreviation USC: I’ve never heard anyone call South Carolina USC. Maybe it’s because I grew up on college football and I’ve always thought USC a more prominent figure in the sport than South Carolina, but to me USC has always been the University of Southern California. And I feel like that’s the case with anyone even remotely educated in colleges/college football/college acronyms. </h2>
<p>On USC vs the SEC in football: How would you, as a USC person, feel if you were talking to a Cal person about how USC has a better football team than Cal, but then the Cal person suddenly realized they were at a loss, changed the topic to academics, and said, “HA! We’re better than you ACADEMICALLY!!!” Ridiculous, right? We’re talking about football, not academics. But I’ve noticed some USC fans like to pull this kind of topic-change/topic-merger on SEC fans. Now, I’m not saying the discrepancy in football between USC and any of the SEC powerhouses is as big as that between Cal-USC, but you get my point: Yes, sure, USC’s academically superior, which explains why I’m here as a student, but if we’re talking strictly football, keep it on topic: six national championships in a row and general consensus among sports critics is hard to argue against in terms of who’s superior at football, especially speaking strictly regarding the last 5 years or so. </p>
<p>It becomes less clear/less easily quantifiable when you start talking in terms of tradition/historically, but I’d still argue that the SEC schools have far more tradition, passion, and talent. Having lived oncampus in and gone to the games of both a major SEC school and USC, I can safely say SEC fans on the whole are far more passionate than any USC fans I’ve ever seen. And I’m not gonna go into the statistical nitty gritty, but at least of the SEC powerhouses has a strong winning record against USC in football. </p>
<h2>**Disclaimer: I’d love to see USC play Bama, or whichever SEC team is tops in a given season, in football. </h2>
<h2>Athletics as a whole: I have no doubt that, all sports tallied together, UCLA/Stanford/USC are on top, as stated by wheretonow on the top of page 3. </h2>
<p>Academics: USC is ranked higher than most SEC schools, but there’s no need to bash any of them, and titles like “third-rate” schools are completely unnecessary. Different schools serve the needs of different people. While I admit that it’s a nice ego stroke to be ranked higher and thought of as a “better school,” there’s no need to rely on names for the sake of an argument.</p>