<p>smitty541: I think you need to give us some more info, like how much will both schools cost you? What do you to do post-bachelors? Where do you want to work?, etc....</p>
<p>If UT is cheaper and you want a really good job in Texas or the surronding states, then UT is where I'd go. If you live in Cali, then I'd stay there and go to UCLA.</p>
<p>the cost is quite different. Mccombs will be around $15,000 a year while UCLA will be about $35,000-40,000 a year. After my bachelors I plan to get an MBA from one of the top schools. I currently live in Texas.</p>
<p>I'd stick with UT. I really don't think going to UCLA is worth the extra 80-100k more. Also consider the fact that when you go to get your mba, you're probably going to have to take out a loan to pay for your mba. Do you really want to be in debt when your in your mid 30s?</p>
<p>Another, in my opinion, better option would be to go to a Cali community college for 2 years, then transfer over to UCLA. It'd save you like 25+ grand per year.</p>
<p>Is it any harder to get jobs in a different state than where you got your bachelors degree from?
im in CA right now, say i went to UTAustin, then moved back to Cali
how much harder if any would it be to get employed compared to if i stayed and went to UCLA?</p>