<p>lol, a lot of ppl (like Clinton) are saying that the Tea Party makes Bush liberal by comparison...</p>
<p>tea party duh
10char</p>
<p>A “Tea Party” candidate would be horrible. They’re unbelievably radical.</p>
<p>I’d go with the PETA member as president. I’d leave to Canada.</p>
<p>That completely depends on the tea party candidate.</p>
<p>Obama would be worse. Oh wait, he is worse.</p>
<p>John Adams frequented tea parties.</p>
<p>Sam Adams preferred beer.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>logic fail.</p>
<p>Am I the only one that realizes that no matter how “bad” Obama is as Pres, McCain/Palin would have been WAY worse?</p>
<p>^ I hope not</p>
<p>The hilariousness of Palin as president would surpass even that of Bush. From a practical sense, it would probably destroy our economy to a point from which it would not recover for decades</p>
<p>gump, the majority of voters believe/believed that, you know.</p>
<p>Anyways, no matter you actual opinion you have to agree that the democrats did run a campaign where they tried to play at image rather than policies.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Worse than Bush, anyway. IDK about the tea party.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, I believe most candidates have done so.</p>
<p>^ Not the Democrats in my district :P.</p>
<p>the teaparty is just a neo-con group quite similar to bush and his policies. the teaparty is not conservative at all.</p>
<p>Sarah Palin would provide 4 years of straight laughter. And a hot son in Track Palin.</p>
<p>Why did Ho Chi Minh vote for Obama?</p>
<p>Ho Chi Minh is dead.</p>
<p>If Palin, ODonnell or any tea party member ever becomes president, I’m leaving. I mean, I don’t mind an opposition to the current govt, but seriously, instead of attacking policies, all i hear is “SOCIALIST” “NAZI” “BIRTH CERTIFICATE?” “HAWAII OR KENYA???” “MARXIST” “SOCIALIST AGAIN” “BLACKKK” “MUSLIM OMFGGG”</p>
<p>As a socialist, I can assure the Tea Party that President Obama is unfortunately not a socialist.</p>
<p>Also, I’m amused by the attacks on him for being both a Muslim and a follower of a radical Christian preacher. He can’t be both…</p>
<p>
If you had any legitimate evidence that illegal voting manipulation occurred, you wouldn’t have posted something like this, but rather the evidence. Your screen name is ironic, when considered with this unintelligent behavior.</p>
<p>To answer the question of the thread: While the entire Tea Party cannot be President, I will assume you mean the leaders. The “face” is Palin, but the leaders are the corporate backers and lobbyists, so I would say that it would be about as bad as Bush 43. Probably worse than Bush 41, though. At least they didn’t go for the plastic populism that the Tea Party is attempting. Nevermind that populism is associated with socialism, by helping the poor against the rich.</p>
<p>Hey, I don’t like either groups, but did you never hear of Acorn? Besides, my post was not meant to be informative–it was meant to be funny.</p>