<p>Can anyone believe this? 0 Wrong, 1 Omit, 770.</p>
<p>That probably explains the easiness of the test. Many people felt that the test was ridiculously easy, and btw, one omit is the same as one wrong because both yield the same raw score. However, it’s strange that a raw score of 53 got you 770 because it almost always yields 780-790. The math sections of the test must have been one of the easiest to date!</p>
<p>Yeah, I’ve been screwed two consecutive times by horrible math curves. Both times I made two silly mistakes (misread) and I got 740 and 750… ■■■.</p>
<p>I got screwed over as well. 1 omit, 1 wrong grid-in. 750.</p>
<p>IKR…
1 wrong, 770. it was that distance from point t to line l question…sadfksasd</p>
<p>I made three mistakes and got a 730…haha I thought I was better than this!!! Fail.</p>
<p>5 wrong and a 690</p>
<p>Let’s all post our scores and amount of questions wrong so we can formulate a table.</p>
<p>-0 800
-1 770
-2 750
-3
-4 730
-5
-6 690</p>
<p>1 wrong, 770.</p>
<p>I made 4 mistakes and got 700</p>
<p>2 wrong, 750.</p>
<p>Yes, the math curve was very annoying.</p>
<p>Damn, probably should have guessed on that one then. For some reason, I had the impression that 1 omit will still yield me 800.</p>
<p>In case anyone was wondering, -0 was definitely 800 :)</p>
<p>^haha yeah, curve seemed pretty normal for -0</p>
<p>=D</p>
<p>-0 800
-1 770
-2 750
-3
-4 730
-5 700
-6 690</p>
<p>EDIT: Could you imagine a day when -0 is like a 690? xD</p>
<p>hmm logic tells me -3 is a 740</p>
<p>UGH so annoyed
1 omitted and 30 pts lost???</p>
<p>Math -3, no omits was 730</p>
<p>Maybe we should set this up in terms of raw score cuz -3 problems is not the same as -3 raw</p>
<p>-1 790
-2 750
-3 730
-4 700
-5 690</p>
<p>…</p>