<p>No, it would be correct in this instance. It would be an ablative absolute (I’m not positive of the English term for this, only the Latin), meaning “Having ____” could translate into any number of alternatives, including, but not limited to, the following:</p>
<p>-Since ____
-After_____
-With _____ having ______</p>
<p>@noloserhere With the way you have written out here, “Having separated” seems more appropriate, though A) You may have written it incorrectly accidentally and/or B) it could be irrelevant regardless because the majority of people here seem to have come to the consensus that the choice was “Having separated” rather than “Having been separated”</p>
<p>So, in conclusion, with the information presented in this thread, “Having/Having been separated” (or whatever that particular option happened to be) would have been the most concise option that was also correct.</p>
<p>@born i appreciate ur opinion but idk…u haven’t seen the question word for word and its like a cause and effect question. Due to it is like the cause and the part after the comma is like the effect. But why do u care hahaha</p>
<p>what was the answer to question 14 in the last section?
i was stuck between d and e
was it
whom was hopeful to become or
whom was hoping to become</p>
<p>@Parhaitiy yeaaa that one. because i thought college board doesn’t like having 2 simple past tenses together in the same sentence, but i couldn’t find a past progressive in any of the choices. so i thought the question was kinda fishy</p>
<p>for the pluto one, does anyone remember the choice that said: “In what had been called a triumph of science over sentimentality was Pluto and its dubbing as a dwarf planet.”</p>