<p>I put 15 min - 2 hrs......I agree yanksman...</p>
<p>btw Mussina/Pavano are on the DL</p>
<p>Yeah they blow, Mo let up a 3 run walkoff today. So weak. </p>
<p>Anyway, I hated this test with a passion. It was so difficult and it's not fair.</p>
<p>the answer was clearly 15 min-2 hr and there is no discrepancy. I mean it said it right there on the test. the test is fairly simple if u just read the graphs and info correctly</p>
<p>i can just as easily say that it was clearly over 2 hrs</p>
<p>For the reading question from the acupuncture passage there was one question about chemical signals that was concluded in a previous post that it "Travels up the spinal cord and releases chemicals". However, didn't the passage actually say it blocked chemicals from being released?</p>
<p>the answer to that one was the one with pituitary gland included</p>
<p>I really didn't think it was that bad....def. easier than the november SAT</p>
<p>I'm expecting 35/36 on all the sections except the essay unless I screwed something up majorly....I was able to check most of my answers, after all</p>
<p>are you supposed to have facts on the essay? because mine are all personal examples and used first person like none other.</p>
<p>yea, I really don't think ACT cares if you have actual examples</p>
<p>for that essay, what examples could you possibly use except personal/hypothetical ones???</p>
<p>G'day i aslo put kept</p>
<p>so what about the triangle w/ bisects and the problem with the slope(m=2) .... i put can be identified for both</p>
<p>Go to the compilation thread!</p>
<p>English- Alright, felt kind of subjective though.
Math- I felt myself rushing a little, but I think I did alright.
Reading- Rushed a lot, didn't finish every question, had to fill in 2 answers blindly.
Science- I think it was pretty easy, but I know I didn't do perfectly. A little rushed.</p>
<p>I'm thinking 31-34.</p>
<p>Kian - I agree. I don't understand how some peopel thought it was a 60-60-60 triangle when all it said was that the two lines "bissected" the other parallel line...I put not enough info.</p>
<p>tennisgal... not enough info is almost never an answer. I don't recall that question, but I am sure there wasn't a problem that couldn't be solved.</p>
<p>Hey well I suck at math...though I still don't see how it could've been 60! I wish someone could explain it to me who remembers it; that problem has been eating away at me.</p>
<p>i don't exactly remember the question, but basically i just remember for that it was like angle a= angle b and angle b=angle c, therefore they're all equal and since it was a straight line, it added to 180 degrees so 180/3 = 60</p>
<p>Really? I don't even remember that. I must be retarded, haha</p>
<p>the problem is that i dont remember seeing parrallel</p>
<p>gkirsh: Yeah, that's why I put it.</p>
<p>for the one with sergio and the paint, did you guys say 2 gallons?</p>