<p>Apologizing for the long response in advance, but I promise it will be worth your time to read what I have written below.</p>
<p>xelink-</p>
<p>I disagree with you about your comment of saying its just as hard to get a 3.5 at any of the UC’s. Completely untrue in my honest opinion. The lowest GPA I ever got at UC Riverside was a 3.79, and I went to Vegas 2 times that quarter and partied almost every single thursday. Last quarter I did get a 3.71 with 20 units at UCLA, but I had absolutely no social life. NONE. I studied somewhere between 40-50 hours per week outside of class for an entire 10 weeks and I still couldn’t get a 3.8+. With a balanced social life, exercising 5 days a week, and being involved in clubs, I’d say you’d probably be lucky to get a 3.0-3.2 here. And that’s sort of the sentiment around here. Nobody brags about how they got a 3.8. People are really happy to get B’s here, and even C’s. However, if you are a fluffy major like English, Psychology, Poli Sci, Geography then everything I have just said above is false. Studying 40-50 hours a week will get you a 4.0 in those majors.</p>
<p>However, I do agree with you about being able to pass classes at lower tier UC’s. In my Physics 40C class (Electricity and Magnetism) at UCR I knew people who scored 40-50% below the mean who ended up with C’s. Not even C-'s but C’s. My first quarter at UCLA I got a D- in biochemistry and I only scored 20% below the average on my midterms/finals. Many of my transfer classmates who I befriended got B-'s and C+'s with relentless studying. For my 6 chemistry classes I’ve taken, the highest grade I have gotten is B+'s. No A’s or A-'s yet.</p>
<p>Yes, Upper division is most definitely harder than lower division, but look at it this way. P-chem at UCR is a JOKE compared to P-Chem at UCLA, I’ve seen my friend’s material that he gets tested on and it actually makes me furious that our class goes over 10x what they do.
Also, I didn’t take any G.E.'s at UCR (besides 1 year of english composition) so I can’t comment on the easiness of UCR G.E.'s.</p>
<p>I also really hope you are right that medical schools take into account the rigor of UCLA. My MCAT is going to be what saves me. I am planning to devote 10-12 hours per day 7 days a week for 3 months on it so I can get a top score. This hopefully will prove that I am smart, its just that UCLA has the best of the best (along with Cal).</p>
<p>strive101- I don’t think going to UCLA or Cal makes an individual “smarter” and more “prepared for the real world” for a few reasons. I now have a lot of anxiety and virtually no confidence in any of my classes. This is because at UCR the norm for me was to score 25-30% above the mean on ALL of my exams. These were hard science classes too (physics, multivariable calculus, biology, o-chem). I would actually get MAD if I got anything less than 20% above the average. Oh how naiive I was. At UCLA the highest score I’ve gotten was 15% above the average. And that was only a B+.</p>
<p>If you consider the real world to be a place where your confidence is utterly destroyed and your second to everyone, then yes, this is good preparation. But I think doing well in life involves having a lot of confidence in your abilties, something that I have lost by coming to UCLA. I would like to remind you that the lowest grade I got at UCR was an A- in very challenging science courses.</p>
<p>However, if you are like how I was last year, nothing I say is going to affect your decisions. I had 3 people from UCR a year older than me (who transferred to UCLA) tell me not to come to UCLA. They were all pre-med when they got there. 1 changed his major to psychobiology and gave up on medical school and 2 are trying to work in the financial sector instead of medical school. I didn’t listen. I said to myself “Well I had a higher GPA than you at UCR, your just stupid and lazy.” Lesson lived, lesson learned. Hope I helped. Good luck.</p>