<p>I said it was the foundation as well.</p>
<p>ohhh right the clock question
how did you figure it out, i have no idea what i picked for it, i guessed C</p>
<p>Foundation.</p>
<p>i said bach and jazz were the influences...i didn't really study for the ACT much, though I prepped a lot for the SAT. I thought the math was almost insultingly easy compared to SAT, the reading average, the writing section here may have felt slightly harder because there were more questions...I epically failed the science section due to lack of preparation for it haha...though I really thought the rest of the test was not hard at all.</p>
<p>By the way, I said that passage was explanatory, not persuasive. The entire thing except a sentence or two in the last paragraph was informing of the problem. And there was no call to action either, he was merely suggesting things.</p>
<p>my prediction is:(in comparison to February's test)
English 25 ---> English 29
Math 36 ---> Math34
Reading 21 ---> Reading 21 (lol,,,hard section)
Science 26 --->Science 29</p>
<p>What did you guys think of the essay, if you took the writing portion?</p>
<p>most random thing ever. lol easy to write about though</p>
<p>I guessed B for the clock. No idea. I also had no clue for the cube in sphere..
What did you guys put for the angle? One angle was 30 and you were supposed to find the big _ angle. I don't remember the option, just that I put E, the largest one..</p>
<p>not bad at all.</p>
<p>It was persuasive. He explicitly stated in the second or third paragraph that the "National... Society" wants so and so to happen.</p>
<p>150 i believe</p>
<p>yeah i think it was 150</p>
<p>do any of you remember the three parallel lines and the two intersecting lines? what was the ratio?</p>
<p>oh yeah the parallel lines and intersecting one
i had no idea
i think i guess 2:1, not sure though</p>
<p>I put 1:2 for the ratio, not sure though</p>
<p>ya what everyone get for the parallel lines i hate ratios >_<</p>
<p>
[quote]
most random thing ever. lol easy to write about though
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I was pretty freaking happy when I saw it, just because within the last few weeks we talked about exactly that topic in my sociology class. Well almost that topic...and I remembered a lot of the examples and such.</p>
<p>no way....it was 130 because it was an isoceles triangle because it had two congruent sides so it means that the two angles had to be same...= 50 degrees so other side had to be 130</p>
<p>i had something with a 2 in it also..</p>
<p>i think it was 1:2 or something? maybe i have it backwards</p>
<p>i thot it was 1:2 since the perimeter of the lil triangle to big was 2:3 so that the smaller line was 1/2 the other line.</p>