<p>I believe* it is the same test.</p>
<p>Didn't it say the tree reached a height of 200 but it's width kept increasing?</p>
<p>No, that is physically impossible for it's width to increase. It's width decreased. Infact, by 200 ft it's width was half of that at its base.</p>
<p>hey guys...post up all the questions and answers u know, so that we cud see how we did!</p>
<p>Easiest to hardest:</p>
<p>1.Math
2.English
3.Reading
4.Science (that test was awful)</p>
<p>umm, personally i don't think any more questions should go up, especially since you have made it clear that your friend is taking the test tomorrow and that you think the test will be the same</p>
<p>What did you guys get for the max age of the tree? I put 3200, but not all that sure of it.</p>
<p>really? I thought it went</p>
<p>1.English
2. Science
3. Reading
4. Math</p>
<p>"umm, personally i don't think any more questions should go up, especially since you have made it clear that your friend is taking the test tomorrow and that you think the test will be the same"</p>
<p>-Thanks, Mom!</p>
<p>... The only question I remember regarding age was the question asking how long redwoods continue to get taller... The answer to that was 500 I think... Not sure anymore, but I think I posted about this earlier when it was clearer in my mind</p>
<ol>
<li>English</li>
<li>Math</li>
<li>Science</li>
<li>Reading</li>
</ol>
<p>Science and reading had basically the same difficulty.</p>
<p>lol, didn't mean to sound like a parental figure, but I just don't like giving unfair advantages</p>
<p>I don't even remember half of the redwood problems... for most of them I looked for trigger words or numbers instead of reading the passage due to lack of time</p>
<p>yeah..i know...but there like wat 1 percent who are taking it tomorrow..and they wudnt be checking out the website~!!! coz their religious and all and cant be surfin it the last day anyway, coz they have to attend synagogues and all...and yeah my friend isnt on here anyway..!</p>
<p>nobody knows how old redwoods can get, it said early in the passage that redwoods are unique because they have huge trunk bases, it said they finish growing UP at 500 years but nobody knows the limit to how wide they grow</p>
<p>E>H
english, reading, math & science...as usual</p>
<p>Since the science was so hard this time will be there be a more forgiving curve?</p>
<p>"nobody knows how old redwoods can get, it said early in the passage that redwoods are unique because they have huge trunk bases, it said they finish growing UP at 500 years but nobody knows the limit to how wide they grow"</p>
<p>-Are you referring to more than one question?</p>
<p>was the thing that has to be assumed by readers that tree rings are definite indicators of age?</p>
<p>yep thats wat i put</p>
<p>"was the thing that has to be assumed by readers that tree rings are definite indicators of age?"</p>
<p>That's what I put</p>
<p>yes douche i was answering multiple questions</p>
<p>^
I'm not sure. But the problem I got was talking about rings in such as stated above. And it said talked about the rings in such. And had something in there about 3200 years old, and then went on to say that some guy found a tree over 4000 years old. But the answers were like 200, 500, 3000, 3200, I myself didnt really think there is a max on trees, that scientist are yet aware of.</p>
<p>Ok, were the triangles in the ratio question equilateral triangles? If they were, then I guess it is 1:1. I still think that the ratio of the square to the triangles is 1:2 for some reason.</p>