<p>The thing you have the most control over is how you put together your application to college, not how the majority percieve your ethnic group. Fixing the larger macro system of discrimination will not get you into college, or help you change the system from within.</p>
<p>With respect to college admissions, try not to play into what you percieve as the Asian stereotype, unless of course you happen to 'be the stereotype'. Then, use your essays, ECs, recs, and the additional info section to highlight what you love about the issue/subject, etc...pay attention to the details so that you stand out as an individual. Use your Asian status at a few schools that have small Asian populations, as well as your top choices.</p>
<p>If you love Math, Science, CS, etc...then it will show through--give teachers specific instructions for your recs that include your outside interests, ask that they write about 1.5-2 pages, and highlight your personal qualities as well as your achievements. If you don't love it, it may show in little ways on your app, that is when it will start to hurt...because you will be like other qualified but not outstanding applicants from every ethnicity and background.</p>
<p>As to the process without AA, some Asians would still have to worry about stereotypes...</p>
<p>Those with Asian surnames would be then at a disadvantage vs. those that do not. There are stereotypes about income, wealth, special talents, geography, EC's, essays, developmental issues, legacy status, etc...anything that requires a judgement call involves a certain amount of stereotyping. Even being in NHS involves stereotyping because it decided who is deserving of membership. The Key Club also makes those decisions,etc...</p>
<p>A holistic admissions process can treat applicants as individuals. The problem is that private colleges can choose a class they feel would be of the most benefit to their current students and alumni, as long as they are not transgressing laws. Again, it is the nature of selective college admissions to look at an applicant in detail. Many different things are considered, but some Asians like to focus on one or two aspect of the process--ethnicity and stats. </p>
<p>Usually, the complaint, here and elsewhere, is about the unfairness of the Asian stereotype--but it sometimes fail to recognize that lumping Latino applicants (at Harvard) with other URMs despite the 1% difference in rates between that group and non-minority applicants, reinforces a Latino stereotype. Why not lump them in with whites or Asians instead? Because it would weaken the point some posters are trying to make about stereotypes.</p>
<p>I don't believe that Asians as a group don't stereotype. All groups stereotype. Individuals can choose to steretype or not as well. The problem is that some people believe that their group is better qualified with respect to selective, private college admissions than others (which can be based on various things like, stats, income, ethnicity, gender, special talent et al.). That is true no matter which ethnicity, gender, region you identify with.</p>
<p>If you want to play the victim, by all means. That's how a victim mentality gets entrenched.</p>