<p>
</p>
<p>Actually, a good strategy in times of bad employment prospects, provided one has good monetary support (read: parents’ bank accounts, with liberal doling out of funds within them), would be to go to grad school immediately, and wait out the bad times while gaining a graduate degree.</p>
<p>Now back to mom2collegekids, wrt the supposed 85% acceptance rate of Bama’s premed majors to m-school:</p>
<p>I think you have to realize that most colleges’ administrators which present such stats are out to promote their schools. There is no naturally derived 85-90% acceptance rate to m. (Actually my using of the word “derived” implies/states that it is not natural, but is indeed manipulated.)</p>
<p>So if Bama had 121 applicants to m in 2012, and by my using some of the national statistics, we’d have this:</p>
<p>First time applicants (about 3/4), 91 students
Reapplicants (1/4), 30 (Obviously graduated in a prior year)</p>
<p>Of the first-time applcants, 91:</p>
<p>No. of students who graduated earlier year, but deferred and applied in later year as first-time applicants: 30</p>
<p>No. of students who graduated in same year applied to m: 61</p>
<p>I used 1/3 of students who deferred applying and 2/3 who applied in year of receiving bac degree. I assume such because the more time passes, the lesser amt. of those from previous years who do apply. Also, the more time spent in m, the four years along with years of post-grad training, would push students’ professional timeclocks faster to try to gain acceptance immediately instead of deferring.</p>
<p>So what does Bama do with the current (2012) graduates who apply to m, the 61?</p>
<p>If they are promoting 85%, then they will parse through this no., and try to defer those who don’t have the most viable stats to be accepted to m. Perhaps this letter of which you speak is the U’s ins to try to control the denominator no. to try to artificially raise the no. to the 85% acceptance. So consequently, the 61 could be whittled down to, say 30-40, which would give them 26-34 acceptances with this reduced bottom no.</p>
<p>One sees various private schools which promote their high 90% and + statistics all the time. Again, it is not a naturally attained or obtained no. </p>
<p>Wrt UCLA, the U doesn’t care to promote its %'s of acceptances to m-school. The U and its administration is extremely indifferent to such. The pathetic attempt by the U, and its 55% acceptance rate were for those applicants which were UC-m-school intensive. This will naturally push down the acceptance rate because UC med schools are extremely hard to which to gain acceptance.</p>