If the Supreme Court declares Affirmative Action is illegal, all schools will be race blind.
They can try to indirectly increase diversity the way California is trying to do it - eliminate standardized testing altogether (Asians score the highest on standardized tests).
I don’t think so. I think the odds of admission are extremely long for everyone. It is not because an applicant is “Asian.” It is because there are way too many extremely qualified students than there are spaces.
Why dont we just tell all the Asian kids who create these Chance Me threads that your chances are just low and your belief that you are at a disadvantage is unfounded and completely untrue.
Your college counselors are wrong. Your family is wrong. Your peers are wrong. This is all a myth.
Here’s the thing: Asian parents dont believe it’s wrong, Asian students dont believe it’s wrong and the people who are trying to convince all the Asian parents they are incorrect is, surprise - mostly not Asian.
I don’t understand how reinforcing questionable stereotypes would help these students with their admission decisions.
Assume an Asian American in California with solid stats but no hooks or special circumstances starts a “chance me” thread about UCLA and UCB . . . I assume we’d be encouraging and supportive, but emphasize that their chances extremely low to either school that there are many more qualified students than spots.
If the same student then asked about a comparably rejective school outside of California, I don’t see the justification for giving different advice. Do you? If so, what is the justification?
You are literally dismissing self identified CC Asian posters that everything they, their friends and families have experienced is incorrect when you can’t prove they are incorrect.
That’s certainly not my intent, and I apologize if it seemed it was. I feel horrible when extraordinarily bright and hard working kids get disappointed in admissions. My sense, though, is that it is really hard to understand for certain why a certain student might get rejected, and I’m not sure it makes sense to assume intentional racial prejudice as the default. I used to think it was, but as I have looked into more I have doubts, for a host for reasons. But I am willing to consider any such evidence.
As to my question to you, how would your advice be different for UCLA vs. a comparably rejective school that wasn’t “race blind?” And why?
If I tell you what I really think, wont you and several other people just tell me Im incorrect or continue to ask why I think that way or should justify my opinions?
“College Confidential forums exist to discuss college admission and other topics of interest. It is not a place for contentious debate. If you find yourself repeating talking points, it might be time to step away and do something else… If a thread starts to get heated, it might be closed or heavily moderated.”
The thread took a little bit of a turn. We’re all entitled to our opinions. As for me, I will continue to not comment on the chance me threads unless someone explicitly says that a fabulous SAT score, or grades, or extracurriculars is not good enough for “an Asian”. As a family in a majority Asian school district I will continue to support and encourage the students i interact with and try to change minds about the “Ivy, T10 or bust” mindset that I think is insidious and does not benefit anyone. I have appreciated reading everyone’s thoughts.
I agree. Additionally I will ask the student if they would consider SLACs (depending on major, etc) as many are actively working to increase diversity. They have a hook there in other words.
Would you be willing to share your rationale about this? Is it true even if the student doesn’t have the “Ivy, T10 or bust” mindset? Do you feel the same way about Match Me threads?