<p>"--How can I PROVE that Atheism is correct?
In the same way that I cannot PROVE that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist in this universe of infinite proportions, I cannot prove that there is no god for the same reason. We just assume the flying spaghetti monster to be BS, because it is BOGUS. You cannot prove that something does NOT exist.</p>
<p>On the other hand, my friend, you CAN prove that chickens exist, or even that dinosaurs once existed. What can we deduce from this? The only thing that can be proven is what is laid before us.</p>
<p>I cannot prove that there is no god, because it goes against all logical sense.
The burden of proof is on YOU!</p>
<p>But, you base your proof on "I don't have any - I have faith"
Well, using faith as a means of justification is, frankly, stupidity and ignorance at it's finest.</p>
<p>If I said that I believed in the flying spaghetti monster, and justified my belief by saying that I had faith, wouldn't you think that was a stupid form of thought? aka faulty logic? </p>
<p>Take a minute for that to soak in.</p>
<p>Good.</p>
<p>THis is the EXACT same way us atheist view theists. I really tried to lay it out for you from our perspective. Please, if you don't understand something, reread this post, it will really help to see where we are coming from.</p>
<p>I'm sorry if I offended you in your previous posts, but please take the time to read this. There is no way you can give a rebuttal.--"</p>
<p>I don't expect you to try and prove that God is not real... as you said, it's impossible. I wasn't referring to that at all. What I was referring to were your statements about all religious people being the definition of stupid, which is a completely different argument than whether or not God exists. My point was that you keep saying that religious people are dumb, yet you haven't really provided any evidence that it is true. In fact, many religious people are really smart, and many are really dumb. But to say that ALL religious people are deluded and stupid is just plain false. I didn't say that you were getting logically slaughtered over the God-debate, I said you were getting logically slaughtered over the stupid-religious people debate. If you really read my posts, you'll see that's clearly what I meant.</p>
<p>I have heard the flying spaghetti monster line tons of times, and the reality is, it doesn't add up. Some religions (i.e... scientology) are completely made up without some sort of background or figure, but religions like Christianity and Judaism have at least some historical and archeological evidence to back it up. Almost every scholar will agree that Jesus Christ did in fact exist... now, whether or not he is truly God's son, if God even exists, is up to you. My faith (which by the way, I never argued it that way) is based on the most historically accurate ancient text that we have available. Personally, I don't take everything in the Bible literally... like the flood, the six days, etc... The reason why is that the Bible has been translated countless times, and it is quite likely that the true meaning has been accidentally tampered with. </p>
<p>But anyway, now that all of that's cleared up, let's get to the actual debate. Forget Christianity, I'll stick to the basic idea of some sort of supreme creator. You've probably heard this before, but I'll go with it anyway.
Consider this... Have you ever dropped a bucket of toys, or maybe a glass cup or plate? If you have, has the result ever been something productive? How about a hurricane or tornado. When you see the aftermath of the storm on TV or in real life, do you ever see that the storm has thrown objects together and made a chair or a table? Of course not, the idea of a destructive force creating something orderly like that is absurd. What about something even more complex, like a TV, computer, or iPod? That's even more absurd, because those are incredibly complex, and it takes time and ingenuity to design them. The fact is, it's a law of nature that things naturally deteriorate... not build up. So how in the world did this universe, infinitely more complex than the best man-made object ever dreamed of, come to be by the big bang without some sort of direction? It couldn't have just happened without some sort of creator, or at least something to get the ball moving. </p>
<p>Secondly, there is no way possible to prove what really happened at the big bang, and what was really there. It happened billions of years ago, and no person was around to see what happened. The fact is, we can speculate all we want, but we will never know for sure how it happened. At least not through scientific means. Where did the first atom come from? How did these partials of matter explode into the gigantic universe? Well, we don't and won't know. Belief in God and belief in no God are ultimately both issues of faith, whether you like to admit it or not. To me, belief that this beautiful universe happened by complete chance, is a much greater leap of faith than it is to believe that something created it.
To sum up my argument:</p>
<p>EVERY complex thing with a known origin has a creator/inventor.
The universe does not have a known origin, but it is extremely complex.
Therefore, the universe probably has a creator. </p>
<p>As for the purpose of this thread, the OP said: "I just want to know how many of you believe and how many are atheists. This is just plain curiosity and is meant in no offense to anyone." </p>
<p>So there you go. It wasn't just for atheists, it was to see how many believe and how many do not. </p>
<p>Dang that was long.</p>