<p>This book claims to be the 'it' book in order to get the perfect 2400. Is it really that good for all sections of the paper? </p>
<p>If so, should this be what a person should use after they have fully completed all the BB, and other official resources ?</p>
<p>^are you planning to take the SAT in October? as a junior ?</p>
<p>^Well I just did the first year of my Alevels, and follow the British System, not sure what that translates to for the US system, but I’ll be joining a university as a freshmen fall next year.</p>
<p>and Yes, planning to take the SAT in October (haven’t really completed the BB, haven’t even started it yet, nor the other official material but just curious).</p>
<p>^Barron’s 2400 is def. a good book overall def. can improve scores and get you more familiar with the test taking.
I recommend it.</p>
<p>So if you were to compare Dr. John Chung’s SAT Math and Barron 2400, which would be better to get the perfect 800 Math score?</p>
<p>Depends because Barrons 2400 covers Reading and Writing too.</p>
<p>Dr. Chungs is good if you already get 650+ on math and only miss the harder questions.</p>
<p>The book won’t guarantee anyone a 2400, despite its pompous title. </p>
<p>Second, you should only use the book if you have a solid foundation in CR, W, and M. Otherwise, prepare for a brain aneurysm.</p>