Barron's Ushistory Sat2 accuracy

<p>Hi everyone. Please help me out im scared as hell. </p>

<p>This dang book is insane. The practice tests are super specific and insanely random (how the hell are you supposed to know who Mitchell Palmer is)
And it asks about world history crap like viceroys. I don't know much about that stuff and I've read extensively Paegant and other practice books. How accurate is this? Im getting 650 lmao when on AP tests I miss around 10/80 LOL. </p>

<p>Also, how accurate is princeton review? Im scoring higher on that and it seems more reasonable. </p>

<p>Thanks and goodluck to all this Saturday.</p>

<p>PR, in general, is pretty accurate when it comes to emulating actual exams.</p>

<p>In contrast, Barron’s is known to be pretty difficult, but if you can score ~700 on Barron’s, you’re pretty much set for an 800.</p>