<p>namtrag: Actually, I <em>believe</em> UVA receives only about 10% support from the state of VA; in contrast, the UNC system receives about 40% support from the state of NC. (This is one reason why the OOS percentage at UVA is 30+%, compared to 18% for NC. The majority of UVA's support is from private monies, not public. I don't know about W&M, but the percentage of OOS there is also ~33%.
I agree with your statement, "NC as a state is much better at funding their schools, and seeing it as an investment in the future." Absolutely.</p>
<p>While UNC is strong in their graduate programs--their undergraduate programs are also quite strong, including some real stand-outs. I do think that people often have the misperception that because a school is a research university, its undergraduate focus is lost. One of the many strengths of UNC is that it does have terrific graduate programs and professional schools, but it is also a fine undergraduate institution (quite possibly, because it has only ~16,000 students-- not 40,000 as in some research universities).</p>
<p>swish: I used the first number, because I thought it was a fairer comparison. I don't know when/how/why W&M's scores were recentered. SAT scores, in general, were recentered around 1995 by the College Board. I've never seen a school list their entering freshman SAT numbers for 2006, and then recenter them like that. So I used the first number. Personally, I feel SAT scores to determine a college fit are fairly pointless. If that is one's deciding factor on a school, then I think the prospective student will probably end up not being very happy with his/her school choice.</p>