Big Ten expansion moves ahead

<p>

</p>

<p>What I meant is to take a look at the boring SEASON that leads to the final tourney. That is a major difference between football and basketball. One loss might kill the chances of a team in football. In basketball, just as in baseball, a team can have plenty of poor games and still be in the “playoffs.” And have plenty of boring games along the way.</p>

<p>Here’s what I wrote:</p>

<p>Time will come to take a look at what happened to the boring and uneventful collection of meaningless games, and see who made it this year.</p>

<p>^^^That is why college football is the greatest sport in this country. Every single game is important.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>What a scam! The report says Maryland expects its travel costs to double once it joins the B1G. Why? Are they now going to fly first class?</p>

<p>I can see some increase in travel costs. It’s a short hop (2 hours, maybe 3 with traffic) from Maryland to UVA, plus VaTech and the 4 North Carolina schools are maybe a 5-hour bus ride away. But beyond that, the ACC is not exactly a geographically compact conference, and it’s becoming less so with the addition of Syracure, Louisville, and Notre Dame.</p>

<p>At around 200 miles, Rutgers and Penn State are actually closer to Maryland than any ACC school except UVA. Ohio State is closer than Boston College. Michigan is closer than Clemson. Michigan State, Indiana, and Purdue are all as close or closer than Georgia Tech (and Notre Dame and Louisville are closely bunched together with that group). Illinois, Northwestern, and Wisconsin are all closer to Maryland than Florida State is, and Iowa is closer than Miami is. That leaves Minnesota and Nebraska as the outliers, and Minnesota is only about 50 miles farther from Maryland than Miami is, a negligible distance when you consider those pretty much need to be plane trips, and both are served by major airports. So Nebraska, at 1200 miles, is the true outlier, but depending on how conference divisions break down, Maryland will probably play football at Nebraska at most once every fourth year, if that.</p>

<p>Yes, there are travel costs for other sports besides football but they usually travel with a much smaller squad. The biggest difference is probably fewer bus-range schools (losing VaTech and the North Carolina schools) and picking up a few more flying-range schools: 6 ACC schools in the 400-miles-or-less range, versus only 3 in the B1G. But it’s hard to see how that doubles your travel cost.</p>

<p>Besides, the last time I looked it was just as far from Lincoln to College Park as it is from College Park to Lincoln, and Nebraska’s not getting a travel subsidy from the conference. In fact, Nebraska might very well have higher travel costs than Maryland; the Cornhuskers have only one conference opponent less than 400 miles away (Iowa, at 300 miles).</p>

<p>But my guess is this isn’t really about travel costs at all. It’s just a way to shovel some conference money at Maryland’s financially challenged athletic department.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, it helps feed the myth that Maryland is somehow going from geographically compact and contiguous ACC to a B1G that knows no bounds of geography. Which is utter nonsense, because even with its latest additions the B1G is much more compact along an East-West axis than the ACC is along a north south axis, it being about 1300 miles between Nebraska and Rutgers, versus 1500 miles between Boston College and Miami.</p>

<p>Could it be traced to the additional cost of transporting the larger than life egos that come from being part of the Big XXX? </p>

<p>Can add to a pretty penny.</p>

<p>The Maryland subsidy has been discussed extensively on the Rutgers dot rivals dot com football board. No one objects. Some believe that the subsidy will go against Maryland’s future profits; others believe it was part of the negotiations getting Maryland to agree to leave the ACC. Since Rutgers was exceedingly desperate to get into the B1G, and Maryland had to agree first, Rutgers was not in a position to ask for much of anything and most don’t care about what Maryland got.</p>

<p>The BIG wants UMd to be able to succeed. Bringing in a football failure and handicapping them further is not in the long-term interests of the BIG. Helping them build is.</p>

<p>Forbes: Louisville Cardinals Lead The List Of College Basketball’s Most Valuable Teams</p>

<p>[Louisville</a> Cardinals Lead The List Of College Basketball’s Most Valuable Teams - Forbes](<a href=“http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2013/03/18/louisville-cardinals-lead-the-list-of-college-basketballs-most-valuable-teams/]Louisville”>Louisville Cardinals Lead The List Of College Basketball's Most Valuable Teams)</p>

<h1>5 Ohio State</h1>

<h1>6 Indiana</h1>

<h1>7 Wisconsin</h1>

<h1>10 Michigan State</h1>

<h1>13 Minnesota</h1>

<p>#16 Maryland</p>

<h1>17 Illinois</h1>

<p>Surprised to see Duke comes in at #11 on the list. lol</p>

<p>^ I haven’t subscribed to Forbes magazine for years. Glad to see I’m not missing anything.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[Michigan</a> Wolverines need to reunite Fab Five - College Basketball - ESPN](<a href=“http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/tournament/2013/story/_/id/9138392/michigan-wolverines-need-reunite-fab-five-college-basketball]Michigan”>Michigan Wolverines need to reunite Fab Five - College Basketball - ESPN)</p>

<p>Chris Webber attends Michigan-Louisville national championship</p>

<p>[Chris</a> Webber attends Michigan-Louisville national championship | Detroit Free Press | freep.com](<a href=“http://www.freep.com/article/20130408/SPORTS06/130408062/michigan-wolverines-chris-webber-ncaa]Chris”>http://www.freep.com/article/20130408/SPORTS06/130408062/michigan-wolverines-chris-webber-ncaa)</p>

<p>So I guess Michigan has finally decided to reconcile with the “Fab Five” after all these years. Go B1G!! Go … Blue!! :p</p>

<p>Too bad for the Wolverines.</p>

<p>Rutgers looks like it’s starting out as a fantastic addition for the B1G.</p>

<p>Big Ten Expansion – Texas Will Eventually Move to the Big Ten</p>

<p>[Big</a> Ten Expansion ? Texas Will Eventually Move to the Big Ten | KentSterling.com](<a href=“http://kentsterling.com/2013/04/11/big-ten-expansion-texas-will-eventually-move-to-the-big-ten/]Big”>http://kentsterling.com/2013/04/11/big-ten-expansion-texas-will-eventually-move-to-the-big-ten/)</p>

<p>Sounds good to me! SEC wants to expand Northeast and is now in a tug of war with B1G in adding UNC & UVA to their fold. ND will give up its independence if Texas join B1G as the article stated in the next few years.</p>

<p>I’m sure Texas is clamoring to drop their Longhorn Network and play Rutgers and Maryland…</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>How many moronic statements can one fit in a few sentences. This writer deserves the idiot of the year award. </p>

<p>Does he really believe Texas A$M can block Texas for … anything? Guess what would the SEC answer to an inquiry from Austin be? Oh yes, but how fast can you come? And that is the answer any conference in the country would offer, if Texas were interested in bolting for greener pastures and joining some hillbilly or cheatin’ conference. </p>

<p>The reality is that Texas likes “its” conference. The school also knows that it was not too long ago that the real champions were culled from the Longhorns, the Sooners, and the Red Raiders, and that TCU could have been in that same dialogue. The fact that the carpetbaggers from AggieLand bolted is seen as letting an undesirable and annoying team try its luck somewhere else to gain the prestige and recognition it would never get by staying in the same conference as its BETTER and more storied cousin in Austin. </p>

<p>The road to get the soundest and most profitable football program does indeed pass through Austin. And it will stay like that for a long time, especially since the best proposal is to join the conference formerly housed by Legends and Losers. Oops, I meant Leaders.</p>

<p>The Big Whatever stands a better chance to field a team from the U of Chicago than one from Austin. A PAC16 might be a lot more attractive, but still represent a huge wishful thinking.</p>

<p>Big Ten average faculty salaries</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Northwestern: $142,000</p></li>
<li><p>Illinois: $110,400</p></li>
<li><p>Ohio State: $110,300</p></li>
<li><p>Michigan: $110,200</p></li>
<li><p>Purdue: $100,500</p></li>
<li><p>Wisconsin: $100,400</p></li>
<li><p>Indiana: $98,400</p></li>
<li><p>Minnesota: $98,100</p></li>
<li><p>Iowa: $97,100</p></li>
<li><p>Michigan State: $94,600</p></li>
<li><p>Penn State: $94,500</p></li>
<li><p>Nebraska: $89,100</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Source: AAUP</p>

<p>[Michigan</a> State’s average faculty salary ranks near bottom of Big Ten, top in state | MLive.com](<a href=“http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2013/04/michigan_states_average_facult_1.html]Michigan”>Michigan State's average faculty salary ranks near bottom of Big Ten, top in state - mlive.com)</p>

<p>Not sure where people are getting the idea that UT, UNC, Duke, or UVa would ever want to join the B1G.</p>

<p>^^^^Gee I wonder why? Is it because there has been a monumental shift in conference alliances? Don’t kid yourself barrk123. In this day and age, it’s very possible, especially for ACC schools. The ACC was so desperate they allowed ND to join without football and Louisville, a school that the B1G would NEVER accept. Let me put it to you like this; you don’t hear any rumors about any B1G school leaving its conference.</p>

<p>Why wouldn’t the B1G ever accept Louisville rjk? Its a national basketball champion and its football team just won the Sugar Bowl this year after defeating the Florida Gators. Louisville is better athletically than almost every school currently in the B1G. Adding Rutgers??? What a joke for the B1G.</p>

<p>I’m proud to have the Lousville Cardinals on board for the ACC in both Basketball and Football. They"ll make our conference much more competitive in both sports. The B1G definitely took a step back in both sports by adding weak athletic schools like Rutgers and Maryland.</p>

<p>You can’t only have powerhouses in one conference goldenboy. There are enough football and basketball powerhouses in the Big 10. Adding Rugters and Maryland will balance things out a little.</p>

<p>Make every D1 football school part of one conference. :P</p>

<p>Or make them all independents, bring back traditional rivalries (Pitt-WV, Rutgers-Princeton, Texas-TAM, Florida-FSU)</p>

<p>

Because it is subpar in academics … because it is not a member of the AAU. Some conferences care about stuffs like these.</p>