<p>i couldnt concentrate on the test...my proctor was VERY HOT</p>
<p>Can anyone answer my question?</p>
<p>ahahah, too bad my proctor was an old OLD lady.....................................newais, i think i F-ed this one xD</p>
<p>wow, if everyone thought the test was easy then the curve will be brutal and I will be in trouble...</p>
<p>i didnt think it was easy...</p>
<p>Pimpervious, I got Rocket A as well, but i used an equation from my Physics class...but everyone says B, so I'm not sure now...</p>
<p>ugh thats not good if its a harsh curve.</p>
<p>Did you get 27 ft/sec for B?</p>
<p>i got that A was the faster one but then i didnt get the same answer as u pimpervious</p>
<p>not everyone...ohly the crazy cc people who get mad when they score 2200 on the sat</p>
<p>good thing there's only like 5% of them</p>
<p>Does anybody know if last year's test was easier or harder?</p>
<p>Also, what was the answer to the Rieman sum for the rocket problem? anybody get 2020ft?</p>
<p>-how bout the one with six line segments forming two trapzoids? what was the equation for the tangent line at x=108?</p>
<p>-what was the answer to the last question on the multiple choice with the cross section of a square? was it the integral from 0 to 2 of x^4?</p>
<p>I got 202 ft.</p>
<p>hm...may I ask how you arrived at that answer?</p>
<p>not sure if it was this way but:</p>
<p>2(22)+2(35)+2(44)</p>
<p>Width is 2, height is the mid point. Idk if Im right though. How did you do it?</p>
<p>that x=108 thing was crap</p>
<p>edit............</p>
<p>dang it....:( , what did I do wrong? 2020 seems a bit too high, dont you think?</p>
<p>I got 50 ft/sec for Rocket B using the first fund. theorem. Which sounds about right considering Rocket A was 49 ft/sec?</p>
<p>Guys, you really shouldnt post exact answers. Tests have been invalidated before due to this exact thing in previous years. Go to an aim chatroom or something!</p>
<p>What did you do with the acceleration formula?</p>