College Admissions Statistics Class of 2020: Early Decision & Early Action Acceptance Rates

I found this discussion topic to be a good place to aggregate this information, so I am setting up a new discussion as it comes in for the Class of 2020. If you post new statistics, please source your information. Here are some to start off–

Brown ED 669 out of 3030 (22%) http://www.browndailyherald.com/2015/12/10/u-admits-22-percent-of-early-applicants/
Harvard SCEA 918 out of 6173 (14.9%) http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/12/first-admissions-to-class-of-20/
Penn ED 1335 out of 5762 (23.2%) http://www.thedp.com/article/2015/12/early-decision-acceptance-rate
Stanford REA 745 out of 7822 (9.5%) http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/december/early-admit-announce-121115.html

And some more:

Duke ED 813 out of 3455 (23.5%) https://today.duke.edu/2015/12/ed2015-16
Johns Hopkins ED 584 out of 1929 (30.3%) http://hub.jhu.edu/2015/12/11/early-decision-class-of-2020
Williams College ED 246 out of 585% (42%) http://communications.williams.edu/news-releases/12_11_2015_earlydecision/

University of Georgia ED 7500+ out of 14516 (51%+) (did not state exact number of acceptances) http://news.uga.edu/releases/article/early-decision-2015/

Here is the list in rank order; I’ll try to update the list at the end of tomorrow’s spate of announcements:

Stanford REA 745 out of 7822 (9.5%)
Harvard SCEA 918 out of 6173 (14.9%)
Brown ED 669 out of 3030 (22%)
Penn ED 1335 out of 5762 (23.2%)
Duke ED 813 out of 3455 (23.5%)
Johns Hopkins ED 584 out of 1929 (30.3%)
Williams College ED 246 out of 585 (42%)
University of Georgia ED 7500+ out of 14516 (51%+)

Not much public disclosure by the colleges, but if data is contained in acceptance/rejection letters, feel free to share!

The one that is shocking is the Stanford acceptance rate of 9.5%. They are the first school, so far as I know, to break the 10% barrier in Early Action/Early Decision. Let’s hope that this is not a number that HYPM chase after.

For comparison’s sake, here is the early list from the first batch of schools on last year (Class of 2019) compiled by @xiggi

Brown 617 3016 20.46%
Dartmouth 483 1856 26.02%
Duke 815 3180 25.63%
Harvard 977 5919 16.51%
MIT 625 6519 9.59%
Stanford 743 7297 10.18%
Williams 244 593 41.15%

Oops, never mind about my earlier Stanford statement being the only sub-10% early acceptance rate. As the list in post #4 shows, MIT had a sub-10% early acceptance rate last year. I guess one thing we could do to distinguish the schools is that Stanford has a 10% acceptance rate while maintaining a Division I sports program. We can probably guess that more than 200 of their 750-odd early acceptances go to recruited athletes, whereas MIT is going to be below 100, since they have a Division III sports program and no football.

Northwestern ED 1061 out of 3022 (35.1%)

http://dailynorthwestern.com/2015/12/15/campus/northwestern-fills-more-than-50-percent-of-the-class-of-2020-through-early-decision/

Adding Yale:
http://news.yale.edu/2015/12/15/795-early-action-applicants-admitted-class-2020

Stanford REA 745 out of 7822 (9.5%)
Harvard SCEA 918 out of 6173 (14.9%)
Yale SCEA: 795 out of 4662 (17.1%)
Brown ED 669 out of 3030 (22.1%)
Penn ED 1335 out of 5762 (23.2%)
Duke ED 813 out of 3455 (23.5%)
Johns Hopkins ED 584 out of 1929 (30.3%)
Northwestern ED 1061 out of 3022 (35.1%)
Williams College ED 246 out of 585 (42.1%)
University of Georgia ED 7500+ out of 14516 (51%+)

What’s shocking to me is Northwestern filling over 50% of its class through ED. Even though they claim to have higher numbers of low income students, it’s hard to believe this doesn’t primarily advantage more affluent applicants. Plus it’s just going to add to the pressure to apply ED early for students for whom it’s not appropriate. Those students can’t feel good seeing more than half the available spots disappearing.

NU has a great marketing campaign, my daughter must have received over 50 emails, mailings that were so convincing! I wonder how the marketing attempts correlate with rising applicants.

I read that Penn also filled more than 54% of their class with ED.

@netter11 University of Chicago seems to be an expert at marketing which leads to rising applicants and lower acceptance rates.

Just 4 years ago:
Schapiro said although the percentage of classes NU fills with early decision applicants has risen from 25 percent for the class of 2010 to 40 percent for the class of 2016, he does not want to further increase admittance levels.
“I wouldn’t push it much more than that,” he said. “There are schools that have been over 50 percent early. I think that’s not early any more; that’s regular and the rest is late. That’s semantics if you think about it. I don’t want to be one of those schools.”

http://dailynorthwestern.com/2012/02/02/campus/campusarchived/in-focus-why-early-action-doesnt-apply-to-northwestern/

Some more schools’ data trickling in:

Princeton SCEA 785 out of 4229 (18.6%)

http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S45/02/99M42/index.xml?section=topstories

A veritable treasure trove of data disclosed by Dartmouth!

Dartmouth ED 494 out of 1927 (25.6%)

http://now.dartmouth.edu/2015/12/dartmouth-accepts-494-early-decision-applicants

Georgetown EA 892 out of 7027 (12.7%)

http://www.thehoya.com/early-admissions-rate-remains-consistent/

MIT EA 656 out of 7,767 (8.4%)
http://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/mit-early-action-decisions-now-available-online3

This year, 7,767 students applied for early admission to MIT, and we have offered early admission to 656. These students hail from more than 500 high schools scattered across the globe, from Alaska to Zimbabwe. We can’t wait to welcome them to campus to join the 4,527 outstanding undergraduates who already call MIT home. Though they all do different things — construction and cross-stitch, algorithms and astrophysics, deontology and design — they are united by rigorous academics, high character, and a strong match with MIT’s global mission to better humankind…

We deferred 4,776 applicants. These students will be reconsidered without prejudice in Regular Action. Deferred students do not need to send us anything new other than the February Updates and Notes Form, which will become available in mid-January on your MyMIT account.

Because of the competitiveness of our pool, we have already informed 2,175 students that we will not be able to offer them admission this year. This decision has been made with care, and it is final. I know this can be a difficult decision to receive; please trust that we have done our best. Take a deep breath, shake it off, and go crush the rest of your college applications this cycle.

The balance of the applicants - 160 - either withdrew from our process before we issued decisions or had incomplete applications and were not considered in Early Action.

We recognize it’s a lot of effort for all of you to apply to MIT. It’s an honor and a privilege for us to read your applications. Thank you.

Again, congratulations to the newest members of the Class of 2020. I’ll be closing comments on this post to focus the conversations on the open threads for admitted, deferred, and not-admitted students.

All best, everyone, and happy holidays.

MIT EA 656 out of 7,767 (8.4%)
Stanford REA 745 out of 7822 (9.5%)
Georgetown EA 892 out of 7027 (12.7%)
Harvard SCEA 918 out of 6173 (14.9%)
Yale SCEA: 795 out of 4662 (17.1%)
Princeton SCEA 785 out of 4229 (18.6%)
Brown ED 669 out of 3030 (22.1%)
Penn ED 1335 out of 5762 (23.2%)
Duke ED 813 out of 3455 (23.5%)
Dartmouth ED 494 out of 1927 (25.6%)
Johns Hopkins ED 584 out of 1929 (30.3%)
Northwestern ED 1061 out of 3022 (35.1%)
Williams College ED 246 out of 585 (42.1%)
University of Georgia ED 7500+ out of 14516 (51%+)

Georgetown continues its very strange strategy of having exceedingly low early action admission rates and then having higher admit rates in the Spring. If it follows the same pattern, Georgetown will accept around 18% of the regular decision cohort (vs. 12.7% for EA) I don’t pretend to understand whether this is a good or a bad thing for the college, but at some point won’t students figure out that they are better off applying to Georgetown regular decision?

To be fair to Georgetown, maybe they are ones who are treating all students fairly (i.e. treating applications equally whether early or regular) and it is all the schools that are gaming their applicants by giving early appliicants a leg up but lying that they aren’t. I just don’t know what to make of this stark contrast in their EA numbers.