<p>I know how hard it is to be the parent of a musical kid, auditions and competitions seem to be bizarro land, with seemingly no touch on reality and so forth to us…and to a certain extent that is true, especially with competitions. Competitions are a weird thing, and in the violin world, there are a lot of performers and teachers who are very down on them, that competitions represent playing for what the judges want, rather then playing to perform and express the piece, and that there are far too many teachers on the juries rather then performers (Menaham Pressler (sp?), the pianist, who has sat on many a jury, most recently said something to that effect), and that skews the results. It also boils down to the jury members and what style they like. An example I can give is that the kid who just won in back to back years the Menuhin and Queen Elizabeth prizes for violin playing, with performances widely talked about around the violin world, did the Michael Hill competition just before the menuhin and according to rumor, finished near the bottom of the pack.</p>
<p>And I agree, auditions and competitions are two different animals, they are based on very different criteria (though obviously both have large elements of subjectivity in them). And I have seen what someone else posted, that a ‘local talent’, who won all the local competitions, when they audition for top level programs suddenly find out what they thought wasn’t true. I know of examples of kids who were supposed to be the real deal, the local teachers all claimed the kids were musical whizzes, they were highly seated in local youth orchestras, won local competitions…and applied to prep programs and didn’t even meet the cutoff level for consideration. It often is a rude awakening when someone who was a big fish in a local pool finds out just how different the bigger world is (I can say we were in shock when we realized the difference in levels). </p>
<p>I think that the person who is the head of the Juiiliard pre college program put it best, she said during orientation that with concerto competitions, it doesn’t mean that the person who won them is ‘the best’ at the school, better then everyone else, it simply means the person on that day was best able to play it in the opionion of the judges.</p>
<p>As my son starts entering competitions, his teacher and we look on it simply as a performance opportunity, as a chance to perform repertoire and to build up confidence, and not take the results all that seriously. Considering that many of the winners of competitions, including big ones like the Tchaikovsky, end up in the ranks of the ‘who?’ while more then a few famous musicians never won or even entered a competition, I think it is important to realize that competitions in themselves may mean little in terms of how well someone does (note, I am not saying they cannot be important, obviously winning a competition can mean, for example, getting artists management and performance opportunities), and that competitions may end up to be like standardized tests in the academic world, show that the person can take the test/give the judges what they want, rather then necessarily be able to create or in the case of music, be able to perform in a way that people want to see;). </p>
<p>One other things I have started to learn is that in music, fairness is a funny thing. Kids who might seem (or actually are) not as good technically as someone else might get the slot/win the competition, because they happen to fit someone’s conception of a musician. Sometimes the people chosen as judges are blind to anything but a few elements, and if you play everything else stunningly, but don’t play those elements “right” it is complete tunnel vision on their part…in college auditions, sometimes a really high level applicant may not get accepted because none of the teachers have the room or the willingness to teach the applicant, and in some cases I have been led to believe that teachers on the audition panel might have an applicant they want to get in, who might be theoretically ‘less polished’ then other auditioners, but still gets in because the person going to bat for them can convince the other teachers on the panel to take this person (I suspect it is why at even high level programs you see kids perform and wonder how they got in,while someone else you know who seems better, didn’t,among other reasons)</p>
<p>In any event, it is hard, even knowing these things above, but all we can do is sit back, love them and support them as best we can and try and help them understand it isn’t the end of the world if it doesn’t turn out as they think:)</p>