<p>I took the Sat once in the June and only had a score of 8 for my essay. so Im practicing right now. could some one read and rate it ?</p>
<p>Qs: Do the disagreement necessary for success ?</p>
<pre><code> Everyone has his/ her own idea of the importance of disagreement. While some people believe that conflict is necessary for development, other disagreed and said that it just cause the anger and makes things worse. In my opinion, I think the latter is more preferable. Several examples from present and history clearly demonstrate my point.
Through the action of people in the world war 2, it is proved that disagreement only has bad effects and makes our lives worse. Because of disagreement, germany and some countries like Japan started a war with victory countries in the world war 1. they created many dangerous weapons: nuclear bomb, for examples. They also took many people from the their own lands to join the army. The war could be seen as a disaster with a foible result: more than 10 millon people died, many ares were completely destroyedm which made the government spent billions dollar to repair the damege.The world economy decreased rapidly, the society of each country was messed up. Just because of some benefits, some aggressive countries made a war, which had a virulence effect, that we had to take many years to recover.
Football is anothern example proving that th contentous is not really needed for the development. Take chelsea fc for example. In two season 2003-2004 and 2004-2005, it was the champion of PL and was one of the best team in the world. But after 2005 season, the coach, mourinho, had disagreement with teams owner-abrammovich and some important players of club so that these players didnt listen to him any more. They played badly. In the end of the season, the team didnt win any cup. Mourinho was fired because of the disagreement with abramovich and the hold team.
To sum up, I think that the disagreement wasnt need for sucees. It also can cause many bad results. In paragraphs above, it created a war which lead to many bad consequences and it is the main reason made mourinho fired and chelsea played worse. So although sometimes we still must disagree with each other before coming to progress, I think we had better reconcile the problem as soon as possible.
</code></pre>