<p>Wow, I'm really moved by the number and quality of responses. Thank you, everyone.</p>
<p>A number of helpful points have been raised, and I'm going to try to respond to most of them.</p>
<p>Regarding the diploma/credits issue, 1/2 of her course load were APs, which have already been taken, so I <em>think</em> we're good there. The other courses were arranged so that <fingers crossed=""> she has already accumulated enough points to earn a C or thereabouts. (assuming she cannot take the final). Not 100% sure on this as information is trickling in. </fingers></p>
<p>So my current best guess is that there are going to be a couple A's, maybe a couple Cs, and possibly an F. Again, we just don't have the full picture yet.</p>
<p>Thank you for the mentioning of finding out just what her transcript will say - that's something we'll look into on Monday. This is alot to get our heads around, in such a short time.</p>
<p>I'm sure you can all understand that I'm a little worried about violating her privacy, even here, and <em>especially</em> concerned, right now, about what do about the college situation. Don't like to even think about withholding information from, say, a college, but as it stands right now, I sincerely hope we just don't have to have that conversation... Ie. I'd rather they not know. </p>
<p>As background, there was a minor drinking infraction her sophomore year. Since then (recently), the school has gone from a "2-strikes-you're-out" to a "1-strike-you're-out" policy. Which was clearly communicated to all, and she was well aware of policy. And given that it's private, they do whatever the hell they want.</p>
<p>Which of course leads to the twin major issues: first, that it's a virtual certainty she'll be expelled, regardless of the timing. And which also means that pleading, etc. will be to no avail. I know the school....</p>
<p>And second.. There have been a number of very helpful and well-meaning comments regarding the actual substance abuse behavior. Please be assured that we are treating it as a medical matter and that ALL appropriate steps will be taken along those lines. I have a substantial amount of experience with recovery programs, treatment centers, etc, having worked professionally in that field in a previous life. I really can't say more along those lines...</p>
<p>The final point has to do with the legal aspects: yes, we have already spoken to attorneys who specialize in this area, and in all likelihood will begin legal action (ideally, gently persuasive legal action) on Monday AM. We feel that we may be able to challenge the school's decision on the basis that the "random" test may not have been so random after all. In fact, we have to conclude at this point that she was specifically targeted, having been an earlier offender, in the school's new crackdown.</p>
<p>Anyone with actual legal background who wants to weigh in on this, we'd much appreciate the input: is lack of "randomness" sufficient grounds to challenge? Note that in the case law, the various states (e.g. Indiana) have upheld random testing all the way to the state supreme court. We're not sure if a lack of randomness constitutes some type or harassment.</p>