December 2009 World History Test

<ol>
<li>Difference between British rule in India and Africa —> the British used Africans as sources of over-seas labor OR higher proportion of christianity in africa</li>
</ol>

<p>The British used Indians in overseas labor as well - in fact, far more than Africans. In colonies like Hong Kong, Indians formed a significant portion of the government police force. So higher proportion of Christianity is correct.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Biggest sugar supplier by 1600 —> Brazil (2 votes)
I highly doubt this. Brazil did not even exist as a colony in 1600. Only small parts of the modern-day Brazil was colonized in the 16th century, and most of it wasn’t used to produce sugar. I believe it should be Spain.</p></li>
<li><p>British acts that promoted Indian independence except… subsidizing textiles industry, or Indians in the bureaucracy, (the british definitely built railways)
Subsidizing textiles industry does not seem to have any relevancy to Indian independence.</p></li>
<li><p>jainism - reverence for life
The question asked what made Jainism unique. Reverence for life is a common ideal shared between many religions. I’m not sure about the answer to this one.</p></li>
<li><p>chinese had to - open five ports
I believe the question asked what the Chinese did not have to do. That would be leasing the entire Hong Kong region for 99 years - in fact, China leased only the New Territories region for 99 years. The Kowloon and Hong Kong Island regions were ceded to the United Kingdom.</p></li>
<li><p>allies won b/c stronger industry
This was not a crucial reason. Resistance movements within Europe, especially in the Balkans, had much more to do with the Allies’ military victory. </p></li>
<li><p>asia and Africa were not satisfied with treaty of Versailles because it didn’t prevent future arm build-ups
That’s not the reason that people of Asia and Africa specifically opposed the Treaty of Versailles. European countries would have been dissatisfied if they had known that the Treaty did not prevent arm build-ups.
These peoples were dissatisfied because the ideal of nation self-determination appeared to have been an exclusively European privilege. Countries like China fought for the Allies and yet failed to retrieve some of their lands formerly ceded to Germany. Countries in Africa had hoped that they would be rewarded with independence for their assistance but were disappointed. </p>

<ol>
<li>second question after Egypt comparison passage – women were generally the equals of men in Egypt???
The passage looked at Egyptian customs from a Greek perspective. Since the author noted surprise at some of the customs, we can logically conclude that the Greek had different customs in these areas. Thus the answer is that men had to support their families, etc.</li>
</ol></li>
</ol>

<p>Solami:
Straits of Malacca. Indonesia was pretty much the only Southeast Asian country that Muslim traders had success with - as can be observed by the fact that it’s the only Muslim-majority country in this region.</p>

<p>I’d also like to dispute 24.
Wasn’t jainism significant for its severe ascetism?</p>

<p>No offense but, as an European girl, I really think Allies won thanks to the Resistance movement. And I put “Malacca” too :D</p>

<p>Well, my Kaplan book puts the most significant aspect of Jainism as “sanctity of all life”, and the single most important reason why the Allies won WWII as its industrial capacity. </p>

<p>In any case I don’t think the question asked what made Jainism unique, just what it emphasized. Can’t remember the exact wording.</p>

<p>Those were the ones I answered, anyway.</p>

<p>Oh, and the answer to who the leader of the first independent African nation was is Nkrumah, who lead Ghana to independence.</p>

<p>About the industrial capacity, I do not know. Both could be ok, but as someone said, Japan and Germany had also a great industrial capacity. :/</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>just putting this grammatically lacking passage out there…</p>

<p>Another passage from this page that supports the Brazil answer for leading sugar producer by 1600: [European</a> Voyages of Exploration: Brazil](<a href=“http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/brazil.html]European”>http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/brazil.html)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Perhaps a fact check is in order? I do agree with #37, 61, 79 though. Honestly I just guessed on #14 and 16, and I’ve talked about #24 and 57.</p>

<p>If I remember correctly, I think #70 was which item was most traded from GB (not Europe) to China. But again, my memory’s failing me so =/</p>

<p>^i put Malacca because it sounded the closest. Prior to the arrival of the first Sultan, Malacca was a simple fishing village inhabited by local Malays. Malacca was founded by Parameswara, a Srivijayan prince of Palembang who fled Sumatra following a Majapahit attack in 1377. He found his way to Malacca c. 1400 where he found a good port accessible in all seasons and on the strategically located narrowest point of the Malacca Straits.[1]</p>

<h1>37 was definitely open 5 ports. it was result of British takeover or w.e event. 61 sounds correct</h1>

<ol>
<li>guilds —> fixed prices </li>
<li>Percentage of South Americans killed by 1600 — > 75 and above</li>
<li>Roundheads in England were led by —> Oliver Cromwell (3 votes)</li>
<li>Feudal equivalents —> vassal and samurai? </li>
<li>reincarnation is not desired: moksha is, the freedom from the cycle </li>
<li>delhi 1200-1400 —> capital city of the delhi sultanate
7.assyrian empire’s successes due to… military, because they used siege weaponry to conquer and disperse people</li>
<li>maintaining hellenic principles meaning… —> mixing Greek and Arab cultures, since hellenism existed in very non-democratic settings, such as in Egypt</li>
<li>the appeal of communist movements in the 1920s —> as an alternative to fascism? or a return to a simpler lifestyle?</li>
<li>Causes of the Boer War —> caused by the British differences in economic and racial policy, most obviously from the British ban on slavery, which was the main cause</li>
<li>Largest African state —> western savannahs </li>
<li>Byzantine Empire’s chronic problem ----> succession of leadership, “But it also suffered from the same institutional weaknesses that plagued Rome: excessive centralization of power and no smooth, well-established means of legitimate succession in leadership.” -thefreelibrary</li>
<li>Reformist Russian Leader —> Peter the Great, who snuck into Western Europe incognito and hiring many scholars and engineers to work for Russia</li>
<li>Difference between British rule in India and Africa —> the British used Africans as sources of over-seas labor OR higher proportion of christianity in africa</li>
<li>Biggest sugar supplier by 1600 —> Brazil (2 votes)</li>
<li>British acts that promoted Indian independence except… subsidizing textiles industry, or Indians in the bureaucracy, (the british definitely built railways)</li>
<li>Rule of Saint Benedict is —> guidelines for monks/monastic living</li>
<li>Erasmus would disagree with —> the ends justify the means (agreed, 2 votes)</li>
<li>% of slaves going to English North America —> checked wikipedia… 20%!</li>
<li>chinese river - huang he (yellow river)</li>
<li>philosophes - french philosophers supported democratic ideas, not societal reforms</li>
<li>population graph - lowbirth/highbirth</li>
<li>deng xiaopeng political cartoon - attempting to stop communism from change</li>
<li>jainism - reverence for life</li>
<li>Reason for sepoy revolution failure - lack of unity</li>
<li>laissez faire - free trade</li>
<li>aung sang suu kyi - democracy</li>
<li>Traded African slaves for: textiles metals and firearms</li>
<li>hijra - year 622, flight of muhammad from mecca to medina, year 1 on islamic calendar</li>
<li>difference between ottoman and safavid - sunni vs. shia</li>
<li>mongols couldn’t defeat the - japanese</li>
<li>east africa traded with in the 1500s - middle east</li>
<li>picture of architecture, hagia sophia - muslim and christian influences</li>
<li>mali - control over gold trade</li>
<li>portuguese countries - brazil and guyana</li>
<li>sharia - islamic law</li>
<li>chinese had to - open five ports</li>
<li>mesoamericans didn’t use the wheel because of - lack of draft animals</li>
<li>people of the book - muslims, jews, christians</li>
<li>map of africa for source of slaves - C, region 3, around senegal/goldcoast/sierra leone area</li>
<li>janissaries - used by ottomans</li>
<li>civilization - irrigation </li>
<li>***repeated</li>
<li>leader of (one of?) the first african independent nation - jomo kenyatta (1963)? kwame nkrumah(1957)? (it’s not nelson mandela, that guy was in the 1990s)</li>
<li>greek/sanskrit/otherlanguages - indo-european</li>
<li>Which author described the economic miseries of industrialization- Dickens?</li>
<li>population growth between 1750-1917- rapidly increased</li>
<li>The accomplishments of Song china- gunpowder, compass, etc.</li>
<li>Passage about Egyptians – making a comparison of two societies</li>
<li>What did Machiavelli assert/write about/agree with (lol not sure which phrase it was)- </li>
<li>Social Darwinist theory would appeal to-? Leaders in favor of expansionism</li>
<li>Caste system - Rig Veda</li>
<li>Mexicas - Aztecs</li>
<li>The Illiad - Greek heroic tradition</li>
<li>Which did not lead to Hitler’s rise - pacifist movement in Germany
**56. Prophets- Abraham, Jesus, Mohammed NOT MOSES. Was moses even a choice?</li>
<li>allies won b/c stronger industry </li>
<li>Saint Paul – widespread of Christianity outside of Jewish community</li>
<li>4Asian Tigers- b/c fast developing industry/economy</li>
<li>containment – stopping the spread of communism </li>
<li>asia and Africa were not satisfied with treaty of Versailles </li>
<li>perestroika/gorby - exposed weakness in USSR</li>
<li>African independence leaders - highly educated</li>
<li>european resentment of japan – didn’t open up its market to outsiders</li>
<li>Major incan god - sun god</li>
<li>portugal looked for naval route east bc… - Competition with Spain</li>
<li>super obvious cold war question - communism vs. fearful champions of democracy</li>
<li>confucius say… - leaders obeying same laws as constituents.</li>
<li>more colonies in 1600 - spain </li>
<li>most traded thing with china – silver</li>
<li>gravitations law question – Newton</li>
<li>Pax romana – time of peace in roman empire during a succession of few rulers </li>
<li>Answer to map question towards the end: dissolution of USSR</li>
<li>hammurabi code and code of ur-mannu comparison question: both depended on victim’s status</li>
<li>what mahatma Gandhi wanted to change question: wanted to change the caste system because he didn’t like the idea of untouchables</li>
<li>language still used nowadays for religious purposes: Sanskrit</li>
<li>Mayan Civilization was located in Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras
*78. one result of treaty of Versailles – Britain and france got germany’s colonies(Confirmation this question was real?)</li>
<li>second question after Egypt comparison passage – women were generally the equals of men in Egypt???</li>
</ol>

<p>A lot of answers on this list seem like something the answerers would like to see. I say don’t count on it… yet.</p>

<p>^obviously. around 10 are questionable and could go towards two answers. most are correct though by confirmation and common knowledge</p>

<p>@hurnuar: you are very much off in many many aspects</p>

<p>@collegebound41</p>

<p>Well 10+ mistakes is a whole lot in a list of 79. Just took some time to mention that the list far from indisputable and largely based on people’s opinions.</p>

<p>Nothing to get anxious over, though :).</p>

<p>^yeah, but like two are correct. at first i didn’t think he even took the test because his answers weren’t even choices</p>

<p>^they aren’t mistakes. theres just a fair amount of evidence from Books and sources that go each way. Theres always debateable questions in history. The first few pages says of Barrons AP explains this. What was the cause of WW2? While there are many factors, “the assassination of Duke Ferdinand could be stated as the main cause.” something like that.</p>

<p>A couple questions that I don’t think we’ve agreed upon yet guys:</p>

<p>1 - British acts that promoted Indian independence except… subsidizing textiles industry, or Indians in the bureaucracy, or constructing railway?</p>

<p>2 - rule of saint benedict is… a guide for monastic living? or a guide for monks? i think those two were separate choices but couldn’t choose between the two as they were really really similar. does anyone remember the exact choices? and which one was it?</p>

<p>3 - Japan was resented by the West during the 1950s onwards due to… succeeding by copying Western economic models or restricting Western imports? (did it restrict imports? with big names like Sony, Toyota, Honda, etc. i can’t see how Japan would be closed off to intl trade)</p>

<p>4 - Confucius passage says that… leaders must be polite in issuing orders in order to be respected? or that leaders must follow the same code of conduct as their servants? I know Confucianism instructs leaders to be benevolent. Hence, politely issuing orders makes sense. But were leaders supposed to have the same standards as their servants? To the contrary, didn’t Confucianism push for a hierarchical society modeled after Father, son, authority and subordinates?</p>

<p>I don’t know about #1 and #3, and I honestly don’t remember there being such similar choices for #2, but #4 is that leaders must follow the same code in order to be respected; iirc this question had a passage with it and I think you could infer that from the passage. Also learning about Confucianism for years in chinese school helps, but…</p>