I disagree. It was to reinforce the Roman religion, or else a religious rite of some other religion would have been sufficient, not just to the Roman gods. Remember, Rome’s chief complaint about Christians wasn’t that they believed in Christ, but that they did not worship the Roman Emperors. Thus, choice A, about wanting to show the dominance of the Roman religion, was correct.</p>
<p>Yes but didn’t Rome tend to be accepting of other religions for the most part? To me the first answer didn’t make that clear; it seemed like it was trying to force all Romans to follow one strict traditional religion. Also, the first answer made no mention of Christianity in it.</p>
<p>Also, why did you say the Indian passage supported Ashoka being a prosperous ruler? I knew that he was prosperous but I didn’t see how “a ruler strictly following those guidelines” would explain Ashoka’s prosperity.</p>
<p>Tributary empire was Ming dynasty China and Korea
Late middle ages Universities drew many teachings from Greek, Roman, and Arabic
The most powerful class in Roman Republic was landed aristocracy?
Main economic benefits of Crusades went to Italian states?
Islam did not spread to Mesoamerica</p>
<p>You could with 10 omits, but not with also getting 3 or more wrong. At least, its unlikely I think. Colleges (even the most competitive ones) view anything 770+ as the same score though-- theyre aware of chance error and everything.</p>
<p>For the Columbus question I think I put that they funded his trip in hopes of getting new colonies/acquiring new land/gold or something along those lines.</p>
<p>With the Nanjing treaty Hong Kong was ceded to the Brits, right?</p>
<p>What confused me about the Treaty of Nanjing question was that it said they agreed to cede Hong Kong for 99 years from the date 1842… which did not add up correctly?</p>
<p>The Diaspora separated the Jewish state, but weren’t they still allowed to practice the faith? I think I over thought it.</p>
<p>According to Wikipedia, the Treaty of Nanking opened 5 ports and ceded Hong Kong, which were both answers. I put the ports as it said 99 years for HK, and HK only got independence like 10 years ago or something right?</p>
<p>I put papacy for benefit from Crudsades, which I think is wrong, and I changed my answer for most powerful class in Rome from landed aristocracy to wealthy freemen, not really sure why and is probably wrong.</p>
<p>I remember a few questions: mostly paraphrased</p>
<ul>
<li>Why did the Portuguese extensively seek to trade in the Indian Ocean?</li>
<li>The passage about the ships seen by Ibn Batuta where Chinese? Arab?</li>
<li>Was it the Berbers of north africa who later translated the books again?</li>
<li>The glorious revolution, french revolution and American revolution achieved? </li>
<li>Gandhis non colonial movement was similar to the Indian independence?</li>
<li>British control over Uganda?</li>
<li>Brazil and Gauyana do not have spanish as their official language?</li>
<li>Ottaman Empire was spread over 3 continents?</li>
<li>The policies of Peter The Great resemble?</li>
<li>Russia came into power after? Tartar control ended?</li>
<li>Eurasian trade was the result of the mongols something?</li>
<li>Animism referred to Shinoism </li>
<li>The Maruya and the gupta empire. Bhuddism was spread by one but not by the other</li>
<li>Crusades most benfited the Italian City States?</li>
<li>The biggest threat to the dutch was? Options were Kingdom of France, Persians etc</li>
<li>Why did Isabella & Ferdinand allow the Columbus voyage to take place?</li>
<li>What was the answer to the chariot question?</li>
<li>The question about iron metallurgy?</li>
<li>Mandate of Heaven was divine right of the kings</li>
<li>Muslim traders gave the british knowledge about the African Inner Sahara or something.</li>
</ul>