<p>^Well duh. And a nice face.</p>
<p>^^Define “nice” butt. I guess 2-3 out of 4 isn’t bad.</p>
<p>Most would agree when I say Kim Kardashian has the ideal one.</p>
<p>^^[url=<a href=“http://■■■■■■■.com/24w7kpx]Perfection[/url”>http://■■■■■■■.com/24w7kpx]Perfection[/url</a>]</p>
<p>Guess I’m outta luck, cause if I had a Kim K butt, I’d be weird looking. Guess I need to start doing lunges.</p>
<p>Don’t worry about it. The face is much more important.</p>
<p>Well yea. The face is the first thing you will see. Then comes the personality.</p>
<p>Well then I must not be nearly as hot as I think I am, cause 3 years into HS and no offers.</p>
<p>Depends on your personality and whom you associate with. It’s just highschool.</p>
<p>CC is breeding self revelation tonight.</p>
<p>Go make some offers yourself.</p>
<p>^^^ I know it’s just HS.</p>
<p>^ I have a bad record trying that.</p>
<p>asexuality.org</p>
<p>Relationships can work without sex, FYI</p>
<p>I have neither. I’d prefer both to be honest.</p>
<p>^^So I went there, and it seems to be for people who actually have no sexual preference at all.</p>
<p>^^^ Once again, not romantic. That’s platonic.</p>
<p>^^^^ Yeah dude, I’m def. hinting at a relationship at minimum and a sexual one at best.</p>
<p>^^Romantic love can be platonic, they aren’t antonyms. Are you trying to invalidate my point? Because you didn’t. Relationships can be asexual and still be romantic.</p>
<p>Romantic = displaying or expressing love or strong affection.
Platonic = free from sensual desire, esp. in a relationship between two persons of the opposite sex.</p>
<p>Note that the “romantic” definition makes no mention of sex, and in fact sex is not even implied.</p>
<p>Okay. In my mind, and I’d say in the general use of the term, romantic love involves lust. That’s just my opinion.</p>
<p>Okay. In my mind, and I would say in the general use of the term, romantic love does not involve lust. This is strictly an opinion and has no bearing on anything, like yours.</p>