<p>I've heard that the year before that, " Special students not included." meant that basically, "Guaranteed Transfer students not included". Basically, "Special" was a different way of saying Guaranteed Transfer.</p>
<p>I'm hearing that the reason it is so high for some colleges is because a MAJORITY of them are Guaranteed Transfer students....while others are saying that it doesn't include GT students in their numbers...</p>
<p>So can someone help out here, and provide information?</p>
<p>Right. This explains why the acceptance rate for CALS and ILR is so high – because a lot of these students the University would have otherwise accepted for freshman year, but there isn’t enough space.</p>
<p>I’ve heard both - that it does include GT’s and that it does not. </p>
<p>I think they do not. The majority of students I knew as transfers were GT’s, I was only one of a few who actually applied and had to wait to be accepted.</p>
<p>Gomestar – I think simple arithmetic suggest they have to include GT, at least for ILR.</p>
<p>The average size of the entering ILR class is around 160 students, whereas the average size of the graduating class is around 230 students. Assuming that of the 100 transfers a year, half enroll with sophomore status and half enroll with junior status, there isn’t all that many additional spots in a graduating class. Ergo, they have to include GTs.</p>
<p>I don’t think so, the numbers would get out of whack.</p>
<p>Special students are non-degree seeking. E.g. farmers who want to take a certain class in the Ag school. I was a “special student” at Harvard for a year, taking two graduate level courses.</p>
<p>Yeah. You can always just email the folks at institutional research and planning. I’m certain they will be more than happy to answer your questions.</p>
<p>I know CayugaRed already touched on it, but the vast majority of ILR transfers were GT’s. I used to work for admission, and GT’s took up a huge part of their time. I can’t possibly see how the 108 enrolling transfer students did not include students from the GT pool, otherwise it would be a massive amount of transfer students. </p>
<p>Keep in mind, technically GT’s are applicants too. Their acceptance may be guaranteed pending meeting a few requirements, but they still have to apply and everything. And some don’t meed the requirements and accordingly are not offered admission as a transfer.</p>
<p>I found this .pdf too and was very hopeful about transferring next year because of it. Even though it’s probably likely that GTers are included, I think transferring to Cornell is still promising. I’ll take ILR, the school I hope to transfer to:</p>
<p>133/223 = 60%</p>
<p>Now, assume that there are (completely randomly) 75 GTs included in that amount, a majority of the transfers. Obviously subtract 75 from both those numbers, assuming the worst-case scenario of 100% acceptance of GTs for us non-GTers:</p>
<p>58/148 = 39%</p>
<p>Obviously a big difference, but 39% is a very good percentile for an Ivy League school.</p>