<p>I see a lot of affirmative action threads being made, and subsequently being closed. So there is a lot of discussion on affirmative action based on race, but what about opportunity programs based on income?</p>
<p>Specifically, the EOP/HEOP program in New York is an interesting program because it aims at students who meet low income requirements and are considered "inadmissible" through regular admission standards. Basically, your grades and SAT scores cannot be too high if you want to participate in this program; regardless of how low your income is. If you get accepted into the HEOP program, you are given a full ride + tutors to the schools that participate (which include Cornell, Columbia, Barnard); despite the fact that you have to be considered inadmissible to these schools to even qualify for the program. </p>
<p>Introduction</a> to HEOP
This is the HEOP website where you can find the statistics.</p>
<p>
[Quote]
…on average, over 75 percent of HEOP students are Black or Hispanic</p>
<p>…66 percent of HEOP students scored below 1000 on their SATs
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I personally feel that the program caters to the wrong type of student. Why should someone who is considered to be inadmissible by regular standards have the upper hand in admissions, as well as a full ride to very good private schools? If anything, it should be aimed at low income, high achieving students; who are, instead, excluded from these programs because of their MERIT. In addition, it provides an incentive to low income students to not try their best for the best grades, or the best SAT scores that they can get.</p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>