<p>Ok, so I wrote notes for the first week or so of that aforementioned philosophy class, and posted a couple of them on another board (this was back when I still had a laptop). I apologize for the redundancy (in light of this thread) since this will be a direct copy+paste. Here is that post:</p>
<p>
<p>Yes, so I am currently taking a philosophy course at my school (its required, although it's technically titled "Christian" ethics, although we haven't touched upon that subject yet, seeing as how we've taken some derivative of it the past couple of years), which isn't actually a "real" philosophy course, but rather a chance for the teacher to spew forth his nonsensical diatribes regarding his HORRIBLY jaded (racist;dogmatic;sexist) views of "philosophy" (which apparently has nothing to do with ontology, epistemology, or logic, but rather absolutist ethics; he seems to discuss that area without exception, touching upon the others only when it lets him make some skewed teleological point).</p>
<p>I've mentioned his diatribes, right? It seems that in their construction he is directed by some basic internet list of logical falacies -- he seems to like supporting his dissertations using those and little else.</p>
<p>Pointing these out to him seems to do little else than give him a chance to mention something wholly inconsequential to his error, ad hom you (I was recently referred to as unintelligent, and therefore wrong :/), or ignore you...</p>
<p>How does one deal with such a nuisance? I seem to have a idiot trying to teach me misinterpreted philosophical principles, and my subordinate position disallows me the ability to let loose the true bluntness of my argument (note: this is a required course -- I cannot escape :nono: ) ! Has anyone had to deal with this before? How did you cope?</p>
<p>As a side note, a friend and past pupil of said class has given me his [test-related] notes, so I whittle away the hour by reading (recently managed to finish (and start) der antichrist in class; conceived in sardonic irony, given the class' title) and taking notes on what his musings (that have little to do with the tests and are therefore somewhat irrelevant). I have included some snippets of my notes for possible reading pleasure (or suffering, if your empathy is so genuine ;) )</p>
<p>(here begin the notes)</p>
<pre><code>Miscellaneous:
The sole purpose of empiricism is to enslave black folks, as it is dedicated (and defined by) its deceiving those subjugated under the white supremacists. Deduction through observation and derivation of basic tentative explanations it is not, rather being only concerned with manipulating and controlling product marketing by observing current demographics - nothing else. This is its definition in entirety. Racism is a form of this evil scourge, and so is stereotyping.
If I make a claim, and you cannot prove beyond a reason of a doubt the diametric opposite, then one is to always assume my claim is correct. The onus of proof is not on me, but on you, because you cannot make unsubstantiated claims but I can.
The Governmental Bureau of Drug Enforcement is itself one of the greatest suppliers of black market narcotics in the state. After confiscating the drugs from the street, they not only proceed to use them (the strict regulation within the system is a lie) but also sell them back to the drug dealers, only to confiscate them again. I have absolutely no evidence of this, see the justification for it in the preceding point.
The Naturalistic fallacy? Pfft! Our nature is absolute, as exemplified by a hypothetical study done in Africa showing that the plebeians there repeatedly chose Paris Hilton as the pinnacle of beauty, and this (somehow) means that our nature should be followed at all costs. This means that birth control is unnatural, and therefore immoral, and rape, cannibalism, and the like are by no means natural (Of course!), making them immoral. Antibiotics, irrigation, and all modern technology are wholly natural, though, so the use of these should be continued.
War and communism are both lies that do not exist (this does not refer to their being non-corporeal abstractions, but rather that the process of war has never been enacted, and none have ever held the tenets of communism in any regard). Your pointing out any evidence against this claim only show the extent of your delusion, and how deeply entrenched you are in your falsities.
All evil flows from capitalism. Freedom is evil, as it is self-centered, and all self-centered things are evil. America, being full of such free radical, empirical, CAPITALISTIC skeptics, is also evil. Muahahaha!
The Sophists, also wholly concerned with oppressing their fellow men, were a group of money-grubbing bastards. Yale and Harvard are their vile inheritance, and noone by any stretch of reality should be allowed to go there, least of all us. We should instead go to a Jesuit college, as they not only represent the zenith of sugar, spice, and everything nice, but also offer the best education in the universe.
Five SuperPimps rule the universe, one of which lives in Delaware. They control everything, and all humanity consists of their hos, including us. They are also probably empiricists.
One should not be skeptical of anything, except when presented with people that tell you to be skeptical. Them you should be skeptical of at all times. Skepticism deals solely with being a blackhearted anti-Intellectual (in that you choose to question the absolutes prerogatives which I am telling you about).
It is the white mans duty to propagate peace and goodness throughout the Earth, and the job of all the other races to convince him of this duty.
Capitalism is the fault of the entrepreneur, as the masses need to be sheltered from his convincing glare and rhetoric inspired nature. It is NOT a free exchange, because the people are WEAK and VULNERABLE. Instead of telling them that they do not need them, we need to suppress the businessman and stifle his evilness.
On Alcohol:
Nobody likes beer. They are simply deluding themselves
peer pressure, probably. My tastes are absolute; ergo nobody likes my dislikes.
Drunkenness is directly proportionate to your psyche, and has absolutely nothing to do with whatever volume of alcohol you consume relative to whatever amount of blood you have (correlated with weight). You ARE drunk if you consume any volume of alcohol
What?! You say that you do not feel drunk?! LIAR!!
Various Quotes:
Terms attributed to us: ho, pimp, pussy, nothing, philosopher-king, (mostly) handsome, beautiful, intelligent, white, racist, sexist, the party, not the party
Credit cards are based off of non-thinking.
You counter sophism through the forces of reality.
They only put Mexicans and Negroes in jail.
Youre society (capitalism) doesnt work, why are you worshipping it? Why are you worshipping alcohol? Why are you worshipping sex? WHY ARE YOU DOING ALL THESE THINGS THAT YOURE NOT REALLY DOING BUT RATHER THAT I AM MAKING UP (last one not actually said, but it seems fitting)
People get drunk off Jesus, Jesus is their booze.
The draft is not a part of reality.
"Why are you talking to da BLACK MAN?" (he is black indeed, and has some huge racist victim complex over it)
Who taught you to kill people? Its unnatural.
War is not real. It is not a part of reality.
If brown peoples money is not worth something, that means that they will do little work [sic] for little money
[insert failed attempt at Texan accent] Texans dont have minds. Everythings bigger here. Hur. Hur. Hur.
Girls get pregnant just by being around sperm.
Sophists used false reasoning to assert the truth or asserted falsehoods through clever argumentation.
On Sex:
Sex is what I say it is. When I say that you are having sex, you are having sex. What!? You say that dancing isn't sex?! SEE HOW CORRUPTED YOU ARE!
Dads who give their son condoms and encourage protective sex are FAILURES AS PARENTS! Therefore, sex is bad!
A girl will only undergo sexual activity with you if she is either desperate or drunk. They do not orgasm from clitoral stimulation. Girls are taught to be the mens uber-slaves. We can only get them when we are drunk. The prom is about sex, and sex is
pixie magic
I win. Stop asking stupid questions. On to the notes!
The reason behind erectile-dysfunction-disorder lies not in any genetic or environmental causes, but instead in a purely metaphysical/ethical one. The reason that certain couples need items such as Viagra and Enzyte is because they only want to have sex in order to have sex, and not to procreate. The ones that want to procreate but are incapable of doing so are really deluding themselves because they only want to have sex. The ones that want to procreate can always procreate, ad Magic. Sperm banks are evil because they are evil, and STDs can be eradicated best without the use condoms.
On Intelligence
Intelligence is some ethereal entity from which all my teleological imperatives flow. If I attribute something to this intelligence, then my argument, or rather my utter lack of argument, is completely untouchable. Anyone who disagrees with this is unintelligent, and therefore wrong.
If I constantly refer to something as wrong, it becomes wrong. Thats wrong, this is wrong, youre wrong, Im not. From this irreducible bedrock of truth, I am capable of making absolute judgments about everything, and judgments to the contrary cannot exist, as that would contradict my indisputable first premise.
If anything I say that doesnt make sense, dont believe it. But anything that doesnt agree with me doesnt make sense, so I am right, and you are UNINTELLIGENT unintelligent unintelligent unintelligent unintelligent unintelligent
Youre only thinking if youre thinking like [the teacher]. If you think in a different way, attain a different conclusion, then you are not really thinking.
You dont do stupid things by being intelligent. You be intelligent by using logic. You use logic by not being stupid.
Turning your head upside down, speaking in some childish manner (high pitched voice), and saying words like pee-pee lends all the validity in the world to your argument, so much so that no logic can avail against it.
</code></pre>
<p>I applaud the tenacity of anyone capable of making it this far, and apologize for any unintelligible sentences that I may have written, as well as the general rant-iness of my post. The question still stands though!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Ok, that's it.</p>