<p>@ftwpker: i said childish. </p>
<p>and no one know the answer to the radii ratio question???</p>
<p>wait was it the acetic acid and air as an answer for 80% Nitrogen 20% oxygen question?</p>
<p>it was 2:1</p>
<p>everyone is saying 2:1… and it was an early question so it shouldve been a simple answer like that</p>
<p>Sounds right poker. I said less diamonds meant faster flow cuz less obstacles frictionbor w/e</p>
<p>On the English test, there was one with however in the middle of the sentence what did you guys put.</p>
<p>I put ;however,</p>
<p>but I’m thinking now that ,however, was the right choice</p>
<p>Also another question it was like such as…</p>
<p>Did you guys put a : after such as or did you have no punctuation at all?</p>
<p>Whats your reason for childish? I think i put New bc The passage Said pysch ppl went back to there field to examine it closer so it couldnt have been New.</p>
<p>Son took ACT for first time today. For background: he was aiming for 33, but probably won’t re-take the test if he breaks 30 – just wants to be done. His highest scores on practice tests were E: 32, M: 32, R:36, and S:32.</p>
<p>He thought English, Math, and Reading felt similar to his practice tests but was totally BUMMED about Science. He said mid-way through he knew he was taking too much time, so felt time-pressure most of the way and made educated guesses on 8-10 questions.</p>
<p>Interesting to me that Science impressions on this thread seem to be either “easy” or “hard” with few saying, “Seemed normal.”</p>
<p>it was ,however,</p>
<p>it was childish 100% because the other 3 choices were the same as each other. and it was ,however, because the thing after the sentence was a fragment so it couldnt be ;however, becuase ; is like a period… so the answer was ,however,</p>
<p>Was neurologist a correct answer?</p>
<p>Emerging and developing =New?</p>
<p>does anyone remember more of the science answers?</p>
<p>@hollaAtMeSon no it was poets… only becasue it came straight from the second paragraph</p>
<p>I think it was creative writers?</p>
<p>@ftwpker… close enough but childish had nothing to do with it</p>
<p>^ which is why it would be the right answer…? nah, it’s new. Childish is the same thing as developing. the topic wasn’t new.</p>
<p>@spongexobob yes creative writers…thats writer… it was sorta a cheap question because it was all about nuerologists doing the studies but it was poets who had the deep fascination</p>
<p>Now that i think about it childish seems so far off but at the time I was like it can’t be a new field :(</p>
<p>@ftwpker everyone makes mistakes sometimes… i always do</p>