<p>For the Euro games question, the detailed explanation of how to play the games was NOT the correct answer because the main purpose was to show the increasing popularity of the games.</p>
<p>what were the choices? i think i put how to play the games, because it does have a brief overview of how to play each of the games. none of the other answers really made sense to me.</p>
<p>There were two science questions I remember I had trouble with. </p>
<p>The one with changing either the funnel or slope. The other dealing with the beads and decreasing/ increasing the resistance.</p>
<p>The English question I asked was about it listing the authors name then book title and it was no comma, comma at end or comma before and at end.</p>
<p>Anyone know these?</p>
<p>Yeah. I think the funnel/slope one was the one with the largest funnel and a 30 degrees inclination, because the funnel increased the flux which also increased velocity. The difference between the funnel lengths was a lot while the incline was only a matter of a couple degrees, so it had to be the funnel length.</p>
<p>I forgot about the english one</p>
<p>agree with the poster before, diameter velocity</p>
<p>i put no comma, it makes sense without one.</p>
<p>Even if the main purpose was to show growing popularity, wouldn’t it still have been a plausible essay discussing the rules/how to play of some euro games?</p>
<p>Was that another choice? To show increasing popularity?</p>
<p>The essay wasn’t about how to play certain board games, but the rise of a genre.</p>
<p>As for the English question, I believe there should have been no punctuation between the author and the title.</p>
<p>1) The descriptive words in front of the animals. Terrifying, curious, etc. What did that add to the passage? I selected that it gave them “human characteristics”,</p>
<p>was that a different answer, or the same answer as something along the lines of “how the people saw these animals” or something?</p>
<p>What was the area of the triangle in the x,y axis?</p>
<p>One of the answers was something like 4 times the square root of 3.</p>
<p>@freestyle I think the answer was 8 root 3</p>
<p>That’s what my little brother was telling me. Thanks though.</p>
<p>I said the human characteristics too. I’m pretty sure about it, because he related it to his spirit or something.</p>
<p>What did Hawthorne most likely experience when he saw the house?</p>
<p>@soccersr - you said this, “the answer was embellished with… it means like to decorate so it obv was wrong in that context”</p>
<p>the “no change answer” was “decorated with” you don’t agree that embellished with and decorated with are very similar?</p>
<p>I just don’t remember “humane characteristics” being a choice :(. maybe i didn’t read all the questions, I just thought I put something that said that is how people perceived those animals.</p>
<p>I’m thinking I got 35’s or 36’s on English math and reading, but I’m scared to DEATH that my science score will drag it down. How low would my science score have to be to drag my composite below a 34 if i got 35’s on everything else?</p>
<p>What did Hawthorne most likely experience when he saw the house?</p>
<p>I remember the question asking for a scientific explanation. Idk what it was, though.</p>
<p>^ I put that he had a brief seizure but I wasn’t sure about that one. It said it in the passage I think</p>
<p>English: Fairly easy, with only a few questions tripping me up.
Math: VERY difficult - ran out of time.
Reading: Moderately difficult - ran out of time!
Science: …Well, yes. (I’m proud to say I bombed this one, too.)</p>
<p>All in all, I have to say that the February ACT was the MOST DIFFICULT of all the ACTs I have taken. (I’ve only taken 3, but this one tops them.)</p>
<p>Usually, Reading is my highest subscore (upper 20s/low 30s) – but NOT this time. I didn’t get to one story ENTIRELY, so I had to guess on those questions.</p>
<p>The Math just blew my mind. The first 20-something questions were painfully easy, but then the bottom fell out of it after that. I had about two columns left on my answer sheet when my proctor called 5 minutes, so I was forced to bubble them in.</p>
<p>Science was difficult. Plain and simple. There were, however, a few questions that were very easy and I found them in the graphs/charts right away. But I ran out of time and, again, had to guess at one entire section of questions.</p>
<p>The timing issue was my fault. I didn’t time myself on my practice tests (stupid, I know - that’s what you get for cramming the night before).</p>