<p>Jazmine, the reason your friend got more money than you did is because your family made more money, has more assets, but mainly because they straight out made more money. When you give out ANYTHING on a need based structure, you look at income in a period of time and assets. You don’t look at how the income was used. To go through that sort of assessment and judgement would cost time and money and getting any kind of agreement would be arbitrary.</p>
<p>The line has to be drawn somewhere, so it is at the income level. At $130K a year, yes, your family was expected to put some of that away for college for you as part of taking care of you. They could not possibly have missed all the “save for college” messages. They just let the “it’ll take care of itself” measures over ride them. And YOU should have been saving too. With past,current and future assets in the form of savings, working/budgeting, loans on your part as well as your parents, is how college is supposed to be paid. You think the line should be drawn higher than $130K a year? Well, look at what people are making in this country. I guarantee you that if your friend is getting financial aid that is a lot more than yours from the same school, unless there is some merit issue in the mix, his family income is lower, a lot lower. And owning a house does not hurt you on the FAFSA calculations, in fact, you get to shield the equity in that house as opposed to money sitting in accounts or inverstments. On top of that, do remember that your family is getting a government break in terms of that mortgage they are paying. The same amount in rent does not get that tax deduction.</p>
<p>So if you want to compare apples to apples here, find someone who makes what your family does and has the same assets. The EFC does not care how you spend your money for the most part or so it will come out the same I don’t see what you see unfair about the financial aid process.</p>
<p>Where there is unfairness is that there ARE families who make what your family does, and less, and they have managed their money better, saved for college or had better luck in terms of job history and not have adverse financial events, they are more informed about college and take care of their kids better that way. It’s unfair when kids have parents that won’t pay for college when they can, or can’t pay because they did not manage their money the right way and did not plan. But the parents are the ones on the hot seat for that one, just as they are for anything they could not , did not provide for a kid. </p>
<p>When my kids were little, we sent them all, probably foolishly, but we did sent them to private school. Because we had a lot of kids in that preK-12 range, it cost us a lot of money, so we did not have as much as most of our neighbors even though we made more money than most of them did. We lived in a neighborhood below what our income would have dictated because we had that private school drain that we were insisting upon paying. Even doing that, we had less money. We had less to put into the lawn, our cars were old junkers (still are), our furniture and decor was not as nice, and my kids did not get or have a lot of the amentities those kids did, in part for that reason. Other reasons involved too, but we had a huge chunk of income gone to private schools. And you know what? There were some folks that resented that we could afford to send our kids to private schools!! Yes. Mind blowing to me.</p>
<p>Of course, that also meant we saved less for college too. And when we bought a costly house, that meant less money for college too. Ironically, if we had just stayed in a cheaper house and sent our kids to public schools and just blown our money each year, spent it on eating out vacation, clothes, stuff, cars, all the shiny pretties, we’d have more for college. because the way it works, you can STOP that kind of spending and funnel the income to other venues. When one invests in a house, a neighborhood,private schools, activities for kids, you can’t just stop and divert those monies elsewhere. You are stuck unless you want to pull a kid out of a school you have committed and if he loves it and is doing well, may not be a great parenting choice especially if its to pay for future school–the logic starts getting a bit convoluted here Also, you don’t just up and sell a house. The market could be lousy for houses of that price level, there may not be much out there for the lower levels, your credit may not get you another house, and it costs to move and can take time before you realize any savings from it. Also a house is more than just an expense but is the home environment and can be an important tenet of your life,living in a safe, clean convenient place.</p>
<p>So you pays for for choices and you gets the drawback so associated with it. It’s not fair. Nope. It’s not fair. It’s not fair that someone burning his money will be in better shape to take on a future expense than the someone who puts it into a good home environment that requires a long term commitment. </p>
<p>But what you are saying makes no sense. Someone who makes $130K does not make the cut for financial aid to send their child away to sleep away state school. The cut off for aid is below that. Does that seem so far fetched to you? The money is not there to give out for someone whose family makes that kind of money, and they do take federal taxes into account, by the way–they subtract that out from the gross. Where do you thing the money should come from? I think by the way, that the cost for a state school is way too high and if I had my way would make it much lower, taking money away , not from students like your friend but from those using it to go to private colleges. That I think is an issue.</p>