<p>pgtori,</p>
<p>For what it's worth, I commend you -- highly -- for your response. </p>
<p>As a personage of non-URM stature, I have only to look back on my own lifetime of having observed blatant racism and social practices that have made this country less than what it could be. Unfortunately the term "affirmative action" has a problem in both usage and current definition. The context of the term in usage a few decades ago is seemingly much different from what the term connotates today. (Language is that way, and that's why we have an entire field of studies to explain things such as linguistic etiological patterns and development.) Still... the efforts to balance playing fields must continue.</p>
<p>I happened to be in Atlanta in August 2005, during the 40th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, and was visiting the Martin Luther King Center. Even as someone who prides himself on studying history and understanding the meaning of historical contexts, I was still surprised to be reminded of just how slowly change happens. Even after the laws are enacted, the practical implementation can take many years more. I was also reminded of my own college years, when over 35 years ago, I spent several months on a remote island of the Georgia Sea Islands living and working within a small community of African-Americans whose lives were essentially at a sustenance level. Every day, I can see the struggles continuing, sometimes not much different from 35 years ago.</p>
<p>The matter of creating intelligent discourse on race is likely not this forum, although there can be no debate that discourse must occur and continue. The discussion on whether or not terrible and even violent discrimination against gender/race has been adequately redressed through "affirmative action" programs probably needs renewed attention and dialogue. Again, this is probably not the best forum. </p>
<p>The matter of Emory's releasing decisions for URM applicants is obviously poorly understood, and the response here by some is surprising. The practices of Emory to celebrate the values of diversity are entirely consistent with every major university in this country, and certainly Emory is not alone in wanting to create opportunities for disadvantaged students (whatever the root of the disadvantage). The Office of Admission had clear intent to notify selected students, based on their applications, to encourage those students' consideration. Emory (like most all elite universities) is to be commended for their efforts to open doors and be inclusive to those who demonstrate academic promise despite having to surmount daily struggles. Whereas many here on CC have the time and wherewithal to access the Internet, there are many on the other side of the "divide" who have never even heard of CC, nor had any reason to since college was never even an option. These are the ones that Emory is reaching out to.</p>
<p>Finally, despite whatever uninformed guesses or rumors to the contrary, the Office of Admission has consistently given a date of April 1 as their notification date, give or take a few days. It's no different this year than it has been the past 4 years.</p>
<p>To those who are admitted, congratulations. To those who then choose to attend Emory, I hope you will find it to offer you the opportunities to learn, share in dialogue, and to apply critical thinking based on acquired knowledge.</p>