<p>Schedule</a> for Fall 2011</p>
<p>How does this look? (I'm in CAS possibly looking to transfer to CALS for AEM) Thoughts/suggestions/advice appreciated; thanks so much!</p>
<p>Schedule</a> for Fall 2011</p>
<p>How does this look? (I'm in CAS possibly looking to transfer to CALS for AEM) Thoughts/suggestions/advice appreciated; thanks so much!</p>
<p>I think that schedule’s fine. You could add ECON 1110 (micro) if you wanted to, but it’s only your first semester. And have fun with that ice skating class; you’ll probably love Linda.</p>
<p>I considered doing that, but I’ve heard bad things about Wissink and Burkhauser though! (Unless they’re not as bad as people make them out to be?)</p>
<p>Islander4, any opinions on micro vs. macro? which one do you prefer?</p>
<p>*I considered doing that, but I’ve heard bad things about Wissink and Burkhauser though! (Unless they’re not as bad as people make them out to be?) *</p>
<p>Wissink isn’t a bad teacher, but some people do accuse her of not going over things clearly. I wouldn’t say that’s fully warranted since she goes over mathematical examples and leaves information on her slides. Her class requires some effort to do well. Burkhauser I’m going to have the next semester, so I can’t say anything about him yet.</p>
<p>*Islander4, any opinions on micro vs. macro? which one do you prefer? *</p>
<p>I’m taking micro this fall, so I can’t comment on the material. Macro, however, is the study of a more aggregate economy while micro focuses on the economy of units.</p>
<p>Wissink uses practice sets produced by an external company, but tests (larger portion of grade) using the methods she specifies in class. If you don’t pay attention, you might end up getting screwed in an otherwise relatively straightforward class.</p>
<p>why are you taking ENGL 2010 in addition to a FWS?</p>