<p>... over nothing?</p>
<p>You GO to UPenn, you should know how highly it's ranked and how competitive it is to get accepted. Why is it "wrong" and "asinine" to say that, as I posted, "You -typically- have to have better stats than a 3.7, 1350 to get in to U Penn"? Unless, of course, YOU personally had WORSE stats, and are therefore feeling offended that I seem to be suggesting that those stats aren't "competitive." </p>
<p>Penn is ranked the fourth best university in the nation. Isn't it reasonable to suggest that TYPICALLY, as I said, you need to have better stats than a 3.7, 1350 to be accepted? </p>
<p>From Princeton Review:
"Average SAT: 1412
Average ACT: 30"</p>
<p>From Collegeboard:</p>
<p>Penn students are
"94% in top 10th of graduating class
99% in top quarter of graduating class
100% in top half of graduating class"</p>
<p>As I mentioned, I didn't say that the 3.7/1350 stats weren't competitive. I just inferred that usually, accepted students have achieved BETTER than that. </p>
<p>"But keep your incredible ignorance on display. It's pretty sweet."</p>
<p>Uh huh. As I said before, give me a break. I'm surprised you're a Penn student, when you can't even understand my posts and instead start assuming things about what I consider academically "competitive." And as I mentioned, name calling or threatening to name call is what small children did back in elementary school.</p>
<p>But if you want to go the route of childish insults, I'll go along too, to humor you. So... you say you're in "A state of constant cerebral arousal"?</p>
<p>Is that achieved by having your head stuck up your a**? </p>
<p>Seriously, learn to read instead of getting offended over nothing.</p>