Grade my Blue Book Essay(s), Please?

<p>Realizing how flawed the essay grading portion of the College Board online SAT course is, here's me hoping that I'll get some help here. So here's my essay for the first practice test in the Blue Book.</p>

<p>The prompt, in case you need to see it here, is:</p>

<p>"The change is to risk something, make us feel insecure. Not to change is a bigger risk, though we seldom feel that way. There is no choice but to change. People, however, cannot be motivated to change from the outside. All of our motivation comes from within."</p>

<p>Adapted from Ward Sybouts, Planning in School Administration: A Handbook</p>

<p>Assignment: What motivates people to change? ...</p>

<p>My essay:
To "change" is to accept difficulties. The Chinese protestors in the Tiananmen Square Incident of 1989 risked their lives in order to bring reform to their government, and Mathilde in Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" is self-motivated to learn life's discomforts. To "risk something," indeed, is an intrinsic aspect of achieving goals. Both the Chinese protestors and Mathilde make sacrifices for their causes.
A strong passion for their beliefs motivated the protestors to demonstrate against the Chinese government. Near the end of the 1980s, Chinese college students and artisans decided to work together to reform their communist government after a set of disappointing economic reforms. Zeal, indeed, breaks the flow ofl ife. The protestors' choice to cease their comfortable lifestyles in order to oppose their regime was not influenced significantly "from the outside," but from their own ardor. After the government's attack on the protestors was broadcast around the world, several countries condemned the Chinese government for its unjust tenets, such as killing its citizens. A life-costing incident, therefore, showed progress. The Chinese protestors were able to make their ruling body into a pariah not because they were quiescent in their passion, but because they were willing to make a "bigger risk." Exposure to danger, indeed, showed promises for advancement.
Similarly, Mathilde's new insight is movitated from pride. After losing her friend Jean Forestier's necklace after attending a society ball, Mathilde and her husband are put into arrears after paying for a replacement. Mathilde's life, then, undergoes a change. Although her sacrifices may have been curtailed had Mathilde told Forestier about her necklace, Mathilde's pride and determination to achieve a goal allow Mathilde to accept "[feeling] insecure." after around ten years of destitute living in order to pay off her debts, Mathilde learns the value of hard work. Mathilde's sacrifices, indeed, teach her a lesson. Mathilde's new view of life that came with sacrifices sprouts from her "motivation" that "comes from within." Mathilde's pride, therefore, catalyzes development.
As demonstrated above, both the Chinese protestor's following their beliefs and Mathilde's new perception illustrate the argument. "No choice," therefore, can be free of repercussions. Nevertheless, the losses one will experience in the course of a transformation allow one to be able to live an active life, rathern than living passively, submitting to various outside influences. To "seldom feel" dormant, therefore, promises enlightenment.</p>

<p>So there's my essay. Meanwhile, how "trustworthy" or "authentic" do you think the practice essays in the Princeton Review's 11 SAT Tests and the Princeton Review's online grading system are?</p>

<p>I read the essay and I can’t find an answer to the question of hte prompt. What motivates them?</p>

<p>it looks like you focused on the prompt, aren’t you supposed to focus on aswering the assignment, like: </p>

<p>Fear motivates ppl to change. ex. chinise ppl were scared of losing freedom and that chick from the book was scared of not giving her friend back the necklace</p>

<p>i dont know btw, are you supposed to focus on the prompt or answering the assignment? I always saw the prompt as a bunch of rambling. . .</p>

<p>Yeah, I guess I did… again (may explain why I got a 0 on one practice essay)… This one, hopefully, doesn’t:</p>

<p>Prompt: 1. Honesty is an important value in every relationship. Whether interacting with a friend, a roommate, a spouse, a parent, or another loved one, individuals expect others to be honest and feel betrayed when they are deceived.</p>

<ol>
<li>Deception can actually make it easier for people to get along. In a recent study, for example, one out of every four of the lies told by participants was told solely for the benefit of another person. In fact, most lies are harmless social untruths in which people pretend to like someone or something more than they actually do (“Your muffins are the best!”).</li>
</ol>

<p>Assignment: Is deception ever justified? …</p>

<p>Essay:
“Deception” promises repercussions. Mathilde in Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” is put into arrears after she lies to her friend in order to replace her lost necklace, and Macbeth in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth uses deception to irresponsibly rule a kingdom. Lying, indeed, will not be beneficial to anyone. Both Mathilde and Macbeth end up paying for their dishonesty.</p>

<pre><code> Mathilde’s self-protective lie facilitates unnecessary misery. After losing her friend Jean Forestier’s diamond necklace at a society ball, Mathilde is bent on replacing the necklace rather than on telling Forestier the truth. Mathilde’s choice of deception, then, is to prevent unhappiness. Rather than risk a friendship by displaying that she can’t be a trustworthy friend, Mathilde “makes it easier for” her and Forestier by covering up her mistake. After paying nearly 50,000 francs for a necklace replacing Forestier’s inexpensive imitation, Mathilde undergoes a destitute life of menial labor. Fear of confession, therefore, divests comfort. Mathilde is subject to a miserable life she could have preempted had she showed rectitude and “honesty.” Mathilde, indeed, pays the price for deception.

Likewise, Macbeth’s dishonesty motivates a fruitless rule. Goaded by a prediction concerning his future reign as king, Macbeth kills King Duncan to usurp the throne, hiding his direct involvement from anyone but his wife. The new king, therefore, benefits from deceit. Macbeth cheats an entire kingdom by hiding his unjust action performed for the “benefit of [one] person.” Feeling great anxiety that his murder is suspected, Macbeth kills his subjects, including his friend Banquo and the family of Lord MacDuff, sparking an insurrection against the king. Macbeth’s lies, indeed, insidiously prevents prosperity. The losses of lives and the loss of trust of Macbeth’s own subjects are products of selfish dishonesty, rather than products of “harmless social untruths.” The king and his people, therefore, suffer.

As demonstrated above, both Mathilde’s destitute lifestyle and Macbeth’s conspirical plot illustrate the argument. “Individuals,” then, can be harmed by dishonesty. Although deceit may prevent punishment for one’s mistakes or help bring rewards, the incomparable effects of lies eventually off-set the miniscule, transient benefits of lies. “To get along,” therefore, entails openness.
</code></pre>

<p>Well, I don’t want to grade this get your hopes up. Since I am a terrible writer and I don’t have the proper knowledge to rate it, but I will say this. It’s better than your other one.</p>

<p>Just give it an average grade. You just want to get an idea of your score, don’t superfocus on the essay.</p>

<p>I agree that the first essay was not on point, because it didnt’ really explain how change comes from within. While I think it’s OK to have “universal examples” ready, you really need to read the prompt and question and consider what sort of essay they are looking for. For this essay, the best kind of answer (in my opinion) would focus on people who made changes in their own personal lives as a result of internal motivation. A good example would be Teddy Roosevelt, who overcame a sickly childhood through force of will and hard work.</p>

<p>2nd essay was much better.</p>