<p>Prompt: What motivates people to change? </p>
<p>Essay:
<indent>"We need change!" These were the words that would become emblazoned upon TV screens all across the world in 2008, as Barack Obama became the 1st colored president of the USA. Change can be very risky, because what the future holds is unclear. No matter how big the change is, however, people will always change because we are not static; we live dynamic lives and change brings life to our work. The industrial revolution, career choices, and social changes are all examples that confirm that fact that change comes from our dynamic nature: to be more efficient and faster.
<indent>The industrial revolution was a ground breaking, world changing event. In the 1800s, Great Britain changed from a relatively static and agricultural village to the hub of the new world. All of the resources were there, the coal, the capital, and the motivation, which was the dynamic spirit of humans. In less than 50 years, countries around the world shifted to a more industrialized mindset and we have never gone back. People wanted a better way of doing something, a fast way to do the work. The industrial revolution gave us faster production of automobiles, less work, and better results. As a consequence, humans changed dramatically.
<indent>On a more personal level, many people have to choose careers once out of school. However, as we all know, some have to change jobs or even careers once in their life! Due to our dynamic nature, people change jobs to get a job that's more exciting, or more affluent. After all, change can be very risky; people don't know 100% what the next job will hold but they still take the chance because there's the possibility of a brighter future - as was also voiced by Barack Obama's supporters during the 2008 election. Not only did Barack Obama bring change to the color barrier of the oval office, he also brought great change to the policies of the capitol. People were motivated to change, primarily because of their dynamic spirit, and wanted a better life, and improvement to the current one, which Obama seemed to suggest with his change. In the end, he was elected, and regardless of how well he performed (or not), a risk was taken and the people have to lived by the results.
<indent>Ward Sybants, author of "planning in School Administration" a Handbook", certainly was right about change being risky. But people like a desire change not because it's risky, but because it is dynamic and offers a better alternative to the current situation. The Industrial Revolution eased our way of living with mechanized tools/gadgets, job changing leaves us with a better or more fulfilling job, and in Politics, Obama offered hope to the hopeless after 8 years under his predecessor. Non of these changes could have taken in effect without the nature of the human spirit, walling in risk, driven by hope: dynamic.</indent></indent></indent></indent></p>