Verbatim quotations from the OP in post #17:
a) “However, Berkeley just decided to dismiss me outright.” Which is absolutely their prerogative; a non-judicial administrative hearing does not provide the full “due process” protections accorded in the criminal justice system, nor is required to.
b) “I probably picked the worst time in the century to screw up because colleges are under national pressure to crackdown harder on student misconduct because of the race demonstrations, feminist movement, and etc.” In other words, what many feel is a long-overdue collegiate emphasis “student misconduct” is – in part – responsible for your debacle.
Look, you’ve acknowledged your SERIOUS error, and that’s great. However, some CC posters (not you, necessarily) apparently believe that once you’ve done so, all should be forgiven. That’s simply not the way the world works. You’re an adult, adults are held accountable for their actions, and decisions have consequences. After one admits guilt, one has to serve his penalty.
In your case, that means (as I understand what you’ve indicated) you are permanently banned from UC institutions until (perhaps forever) the Chancellor approves your re-enrollment. I don’t have a clue whether that’s a reasonable penalty or not and, candidly, opinions are irrelevant because it’s the sanction determined to be suitable by UCB. I thought a few years in the military might be both personally beneficial AND precisely the sort of experience that Berkeley might believe justifies your re-matriculation. Evidently, that’s an option you do not wish to purse, which is certainly your privilege. However, this leaves you with no viable path forward (as far as I can ascertain).
I would be willing to wager that it will be years until UCB is willing (possibly) to approve your readmission. Are on-line undergraduate programs accredited and would they admit you, since your direct interface with other students would be limited? Are overseas universities a potential alternative? Would for-profit “institutions” be a reasonable possibility?
I mention these options because I suspect your admission to any “standard” four-year institution will be extremely problematic. Why would they incur the potentially significant legal, political and media risks associated with your matriculation? I’m sure you will understand that the reporter, the local legislator, and the tax paying citizen would all react with both incredulity and with a “what were those boneheads at X University thinking” attitude, were you again to commit a serious conduct offense after X enrolled you, knowing that you had been expelled from UCB due to your unacceptable comportment.