<p>I just took one of Barron's practice tests from their Math II prep book and I got like 22-50 (23 wrong). I had to guess on about 6 of them and left 5 blank. Previously I had taken Sparknote's practice test and got a 680. Anyways, we just finished the Trig part of my pre-cal classes, so now we'll be getting into logs, and some functions which should help me out, but now I'm really worried, because I really want to get a 800. Anyways, I know Barron's has a reputation as being harder than the actual test, but how much harder? Their function problems in particular seem a harder.</p>
<p>People generally score about 100 points higher on the real test than the Barron’s tests.</p>
<p>How are Princeton Review’s and Kaplan’s tests? I already have the official CB tests, but there are only 2. So I could use some more realistic tests. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Barron’s is wayyyyyyyyy tooo hard…dont use it unless you have lots of time…</p>
<p>i got 19/50 right on it. generally my score stayed around there with barron’s </p>
<p>i got a 770 on the real thing.</p>
<p>Unleashed Fury,</p>
<p>That’s a sigh of relief 
Because I would really like a 800, and so I was really scared after getting 22 right.</p>
<p>I used McGraw-Hill tests and found them reasonably helpful, although there were a few differences between them and the real test. Make sure you use keep using Barron’s no matter what else you use, though, because that’s what virtually everyone recommends.</p>