<p>777Blue77 </p>
<p>My mistake, a 3.6 is indeed Magna Cum Laude, not Summa, but my point is that a 3.6 is considered as Latin honors at Wharton…</p>
<p>Given that Magna Cum Laude is an honor usually only given students near the top 10-15% of students at prestigious universities, no way the AVERAGE GPA can be a 3.6 at Wharton. Just take a few moments and try to mathematically or numerically reason it out. It won’t make sense for that to be the case. </p>
<p>Even if, let’s just say, 40% of the class of about 630, graduated with Latin Honors, with 5% in Summa Cum Laude, the next 10% in Magna Cum Laude, and next 25% in Cum Laude, while the each person in the remaining 60% of students has a 3.39, the highest possible gpa for a non-Latin honors student. (This is already a very generous assumption that is in favor of YOUR argument, as I am playing the devil’s advocate here). But if you do the math, you will find that the top 40% of students would need to average a 3.915 to maintain the 3.6 total gpa, which isn’t possible. </p>
<p>Calculations:</p>
<p>(3.6)(630)=2268, The total amount of points a 3.6 average would add up to in a class of 630</p>
<p>(3.39)(.60)(630)=(3.39)(378)=1281.42, The total amount of points of the bottom 60% of the class, given that they all have a 3.39, the highest possible non Latin honors gpa.</p>
<p>2268-1281.42= 986.58, Subtract to get the total number of points needed for the other 40% of students’s gpas to sum in order to maintain a 3.6 </p>
<p>(X)(630)(.40)=986.58
252x= 986.58
X=3.915</p>
<p>On average, the other 40% would need a 3.915, which is not possible since that means 40% of the students would need to be in the Summa cum laude group.</p>
<p>Wharton definitely doesn’t do that, and therefore, the average gpa can’t be a 3.6. </p>
<p>Q.E.D. </p>