<p>Consider this: You can have perfect SAT/ACT/SAT II scores, a perfect GPA, great essays, amazing EC’s, challenging life circumstances which you have overcome, be well liked and be the darling of all your teachers. And, this can all help you get into lots of the very top schools. However, that doesn’t mean you’re going to be able to handle them without a hitch. The thing you are missing when you go to college is heavy, present, parental support, the carrot of top college admissions, and the absence of partying in your residence. Because you probably avoided much partying in high school and put off many types of enjoyment to get into top schools, you may have a hard time resisting these things in college. Further, you may not have the self-discipline away from your parents and your quiet, clean, well run home to pull off similar performance in college. So, while you want the brand name, the research and learning opportunities, or perhaps simply the community of equally brilliant scholars (finally), you may be in for the challenge of your life. This can be a good thing, but only if you’re willing to face the music and change/grow fast and without giving up. </p>
<p>My point is that getting in can be the lesser of the challenges when you also must stay in and get a good GPA, good research opportunities while still a student, and good recommendations from peers and professors. </p>
<p>As for whether you should retake an SAT if the score is less than 2000, I would say it would be worth it. Get some training to bring it up, and do it. That is one factor in admissions when two similar students are being evaluated. That doesn’t mean you’re not “acceptable.” It means that you’re willing to go for the best you can get, and it’s assumed that your highest score is the best you can get. Now, if you get a 2298, maybe it’s not worth trying to raise it because it may be viewed as about the same as a 2400. But, below 2000 would not be. You would be viewed as a little less capable among a field of highly capable contenders. Because finaid is so amazing at these schools, it may be worth the $$$ and time to raise it. </p>
<p>No, there is no shame in attending a state school. Of course not. But, such a school may or may not best meet your needs. The point is meeting your educational needs to best prepare you to meet your life goals. If your motivation is primarily about brand name and pride, you still might to fine but pick schools that have a lot of other people doing that, not the brutal schools where it’s all about the challenge. </p>
<p>If you didn’t apply to safeties or likelies and only applied to reaches and didn’t get in, relax already. Take a gap year, get heavily involved in a research project with the best researcher you can find who will mentor you, or do something else admirable and unique so that you are a better candidate than most of the students for that next year’s class. Remember that you have limited time to get it going and show results, though. You will need to start applying within six months. So, get moving. For a top student, I’d rather see them do that then to just take whatever they can get into on a shorter term application basis. On the other hand, a top student can shine in a state university if they have the right mentor. They can get the best advice, equipment, scholarships, and access to researchers if they play it right. There may have been reasons you weren’t accepted to the very top schools, and it could be more about personality than anything. So, consider that as a clue as to what could work best for you. Even if you take a gap year, still ask your current admissions to allow you a year’s deferment of acceptance so you can “enhance your project management skills,” “give back to the community” or whatever. Then, apply to more likely schools just in case. </p>
<p>Don’t let school choices be about pride and esteem. Pick the school that will help you best develop, and it’s not always the very top rated universities.</p>