<p>i have the say the writing... 1460/1600 w/o writing and 2120/2400 with writing...</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 42
Math: 15
Writing: 30</p>
<p>cr: 43
m: 15
w:30</p>
<p>anyone who wants to eliminate math should be keel hauled. lol jk.</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 44
Math: 15
Writing: 30</p>
<p>math is great :P crit reading sucks.....</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 44
Math: 15
Writing: 31</p>
<p>CR ruins my life</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 15
Writing: 31
it's odd, because i thought that i was one of the few ppl who thought critical reading was hard!</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 15
Writing: 32</p>
<p>Writing section IMO is useless! I mean honestly, when are you tested on grammar past freshman year?</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 15
Writing: 33
I don't like the fact that someone who is better at English than Math by the same margin will score better than someone who is better at Math than English. If you're going to add a writing section, how about a science reasoning section to go with it? Oh, that would be called the ACT. (I'm not really trolling for the ACt - I never took it, so I can't really have an opinion about it).</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 16
Writing: 33</p>
<p>Blah I do really well on the Writing and Critical Reading sections....but math... >_>;; I feel like I'd forgotten a lot of geometry before I took this test last year, and I had. I've been reviewing a lot for the math section for the June 2 test...hope it helps....</p>
<p>I'm glad that my stronger area is English rather than Math. That does suck for people in the opposite situation, though. :(</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 17
Writing: 33</p>
<p>see i think the prob with CR is that the questions and answers can be interpreted many diff ways whereas in math, there's only one solid answer. that's why im hoping the act reading's gonna be easier :D</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 18
Writing: 33</p>
<p>I don't like the writing, but it does help you to communicate. Critical reading is easy for me naturally because I can find the meaning behind things very easily. Even in real life I can tell what people are feeling when they are trying to lie to me (maybe because I do it so much :-p). Critical reading just takes a little bit of thought and empathy to try to understand what the person is asking.</p>
<p>Math on the other hand, is far more rigid. Maybe its because I don't like things in life to be straitlaced and one way, but math is just too factual for me. Its too mechanical and boring plus its basically straight memorization of formulas and just applying them to situations that will NEVER occur in real life because we have machines and all do to 99% of the math asked on tests.</p>
<p>Critical Reading: 45
Math: 18
Writing: 34</p>
<p>Writing is unnecessary because colleges can tell if you understand grammar or know how to write an essay when they read your application essays. (and knowledge of what type of writing you can do in 25 minutes at about 8:00 on a Saturday morning is probably not useful in any way)</p>
<p>It also makes the test lopsided as 2/3 focuses on 'words' while only 1/3 focuses on 'numbers'</p>
<p>Critical reading : 46
Math:18
Writing:34</p>
<p>Cr is crazily hard, i can't get past 550 LOL</p>
<p>Critical reading : 47
Math:18
Writing:34</p>
<p>I hated critical reading! Strangely, the other sections were almost enjoyable ;)</p>
<p>Critical reading : 47
Math:18
Writing:35</p>
<p>I just hate writing lol.</p>
<p>Critical reading : 48
Math:18
Writing:35</p>
<p>As far as the English sections go, writing is much more useful for any career path than CR.</p>
<p>Critical Readin: 48
Math: 18
Writing: 36</p>
<p>Writing is just so useless and much more boring the study for than CR.</p>
<p>I am like writing since because my grammer's are amazingly good.</p>
<p>My vote already for Critical Reading for obvious reason:
770 Math
780 Writing
680 CR</p>
<p>Critical Readin: 48
Math: 18
Writing: 37</p>
<p>The test is SERIOUSLY too long. I almost fainted at the end. I would eliminate the writing part and put it back to the SAT II.</p>