<p>Your post is a little all over the place, but I'll tell you what I can.</p>
<p>IS can be a lot of things. A lot. MIS is what most people are familiar with, which is essentially a vocational discipline that generally prepares you to manage or personally develop enterprise-level intra or extranets, and most MIS graduates are expected to also be proficient in networking/IT. Your course load also might include a significant portion of business administration courses, as MIS graduates are basically trained to both develop the infrastructure and manage the people who's full-time job it is to manage it. An MIS graduate is closer to a 'small scale' CTO or (in some cases) CIO than he is a regular developer 'worker bee.'</p>
<p>There's also issues with naming conventions. Now, you're posting in the business major subforum, so it's expected you're posting about Information Systems. But it can also be Information Science, which is closer at some schools to HCI/UI (human-computer interaction, user interface), multimedia and client/server-side web programming.</p>
<p>In either of these scenarios you're going to learn about information design/architecture, which is basically a way of saying "a map for content." M infront of IS obviously means management, and MIS generally signifies IT/networking and intra/extranet work with a management bend to the curriculum, as opposed to focused web programming and HCI/UI.</p>
<p>Information Science can also be... Information Science. Confused yet? Information Science is technically one of two names given to the discipline librarians learn (the other name being library sciene), and if you search for it you might find that half the results are about librarians and the other half are about computational information science.</p>
<p>Basically, systems is closer to making and maintaining the 'bridge' between computer science and business, while science is generally either focused on usability and human interaction or web technology. Either can involve networking.</p>
<p>The difference between Computer Science and MIS, ISystems or IScience (doesn't matter which) is theory. It's like the difference between finance and economics. One is heavy on the theory, the other is closer to a vocational degree. Theoretically you can learn the programming languages and skills you want to as a CS major- but in many cases the curriculum won't be structured the way you want it. What CS does is heavily introduce you to programming logic and all the things that go along with it, just like economics introduces you to economic theory. You may not care about how societies manage resources, you just want to learn how to invest. Application, not theory.</p>
<p>Good CS programs are supposed to be a mix of application and theory, but the reality is that even the most prestigious CS programs focus heavily on theory over application. In CS you may never work with web programming languages, and in the "informations" you may only have introductory classes to C and Java (generally the mainstays of CS programs).</p>
<p>As for finance and accounting courses being similar to econ classes- they're not, but the prerequisites to them are going to be introduction to theory courses like the what you've taken (macro and microeconomics). Most markets are competitive, and business administration is one of the most common majors in America. Also, don't expect business to improve your writing skills. Writing will improve your writing skills. Business will probably improve your oratory skills more than it will your writing ability.</p>
<p>The "rebound" is what it is- 'the cutting edge' has a penchant for spectacular crashes, and technology is generally considered the cutting edge. The fact of the matter is that there has always and probably will always be a massive shortage of computer engineers and programmers, while many of the most 'elite' people in networking and IT never graduated college. Work experience is more important in networking/IT than it is in any other field but possibly the military. Does this mean you shouldn't become involved in the field? No, it just means that like anything else there's going to be competition and you better enjoy the topic to get past the difficulties caused by competition.</p>
<p>As for your other concerns, you're having a mini-existential crisis. It's not a bad thing, and it happens to people a lot. Anything can be made boring. Snowboarding can be made boring by a bad instructor. The way you know you like it is if you continue on despite the quality of education you receive. Finance will be made boring by bad instructors, so will economics and computer science and every other discipline on Earth from cooking to building nuclear submarines.</p>
<p>I'm going to tell you a secret that a lot of the younger people on this forum aren't really aware of- you can make a lot of money doing anything. I know "passion" and loving what you do has become a cliche at this point, but it's accurate. It has to be true passion though, the kind where you read about the topic even when you're not at work and you think about it in the abstract when you're not in class.</p>
<p>Anecdotal evidence is normally horrible, but I'll still relay the story of my boss to you. He had two kids, was unmarried and was dirt poor when he was in his early thirties. He went back to community college, started working for a property management firm and by the time he graduated with a degree in accounting from a low-quality four year that probably no one on this forum knows exists he was preparing to buy the business from his boss.</p>
<p>He's in his early forties now, he runs the business remotely and manages over 20 large malls while privately investing in real estate, his illiquid assets are probably over 3m and his liquid assets are well over a quarter of a million. He did it in a little over 10 years, and he hasn't been hurt by the housing bubble (he obviously can't move the properties, but he's not losing money) even though he lives in Florida because he didn't overleverage himself.</p>
<p>Why didn't the editors at the NY Times create Wikipedia? Why didn't the 'creative content' people at MTV create Facebook? Why didn't Target or Macy's become the first e-tailing juggernaut instead of Amazon?</p>
<p>It doesn't matter what field you work in, as long as you enjoy it, continue studying it, manage your money well and keep your mind open to innovation and entrepreneurship. And when I say entrepreneurship I don't mean being taught entrepreneurship- it's impossible to teach someone to think innovatively. An MBA in entrepreneurship is ********. It doesn't matter if you go to Wharton, concentrating on entrepreneurship will only teach you about the legalities of starting a business, the intricacies of venture capital, theories of personnel management and the basics of any business administration degree.</p>
<p>The creator of Dilbert (of all people) probably wrote the smartest thing I've ever read when it comes to the topic of success in a career. There are two ways to be successful, assuming everyone starts at the same point with the same level of intelligence. The first way is to become exceptional at something. This is tremendously difficult. Everyone else with ambition is trying to become exceptional at something, and those few people who really do become exceptional at that one thing generally have some resource or talent you don't.</p>
<p>The second way to become successful is to become good (top 25%) at two things. This is much easier, and often times that second thing can be rhetorical skills. There are engineers today making $60,000/yr working 60 hours a week that could instead be working 20 hours a week as consultants for $150,000/yr- if they had people skills, a willingness to network and take some chances and basic financial and managerial skills.</p>
<p>What I'm trying to tell you is that you're worrying about the job market while you're still in school and you haven't even delcared a major that could conceivably lead you to that job market. You're putting the cart before the horse. You find what you're passionate about and skillful in, then you worry about that job market. You don't find what has a good job market and then try to become passionate about it and skillful in it.</p>