<p>I was actually wondering how Duke ended up with the rank it had. The WSJ feeder ranking gives its methodology very straightforward, so I know why Duke is ranked high on that. But its different for US News. It looks similar, stat-wise, to Columbia, Dartmouth, Brown, and Northwestern yet those are ranked 9, 9, 14, and 12 while Duke is ranked in the top 6. In my mind, I would rank Duke aside these schools, not above them - Dartmouth even has a higher average SAT score spread than Duke. So I am also wondering about the major factors since acceptance rate and SAT scores don't seem that important.</p>
<p>This was posted earlier comparing it and schools usually thought of as similar to it:</p>
<p>Brown, 17%, 1310-1520, ranked 14th
Columbia, 11%, 1320 - 1520, ranked 9th
Cornell, 29%, 1290 - 1490, ranked 13th
Dartmouth, 19%, 1360-1550, ranked 9th
Duke, 22%, 1330 - 1530, ranked 6th
Johns Hopkins, 30%, 1300 - 1490, ranked 13th
Northwestern, 30%, 1300 - 1520, ranked 12th
Penn, 21%, 1330 - 1500, ranked 4th</p>
<p>Duke's professional schools are all top 10 or around there so atleast the professional schools are good. When people say it has a regional reputation, I'm not sure how its any more regional than Penn or Columbia (in the sense that both schools have similar propotions of students from in-state, have primarily applicants from the Northeast, and have similar number of apps overall). After all, if it was regional, most students who picked it over its Northeastern counterparts wouldn't have lol.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, on the WSJ feeder rankings, the universities ahead of Duke are Harv Pton Yale and Stanford, and those are all higher or tied with Duke. I wonder of the preprofessional aspect has some sort influence on US news.</p>