<p>You did not state where you are from, or what schools you are comparing Toronto to, but I can tell you that the rankings are pretty accurate.</p>
<p>The Princeton Review rankings only rank two Canadian universities I believe (Toronto and McGill). Both score high in rather unflattering rankings.</p>
<p>I believe, however, that if more Canadian universities were ranked, they would all score poorly in certain areas, because Canadians have a different understanding of the purpose of higher education than Americans do. It makes a big difference whether you’re comparing UofT to other Canadian universities or to American universities.</p>
<p>From an American perspective, the University of Toronto is the extreme opposite of attending an American liberal arts college (LAC). Arguably, the LAC environment is the best-suited for teaching the humanities, so this is something to keep in mind.</p>
<p>The part about “least accessible professors” is somewhat debatable. What is more true is that students at this university do not bother to access their professors. It’s a two-way relationship, you know.</p>
<p>However, the “class discussions rare” ranking is something to take very seriously. Julles92 says there are seminars as if that counters the ranking (newsflash: almost all schools have some kind of seminar-style courses). Toronto’s seminars are only open to first year students, and are mostly considered a joke anyway. And even in these seminars, the class discussion feels more forced than organic. </p>
<p>The fact that the first thing he states is that the seminars “base a large portion (30%) of the grade on class discussion” should tell you everything you need to know about the culture of Toronto –</p>
<p>Grades first, learning second. Students, for the most part, don’t pay attention to anything that doesn’t affect their grade.</p>
<p>In fields where a strict curriculum is necessary, like engineering, Toronto seems to do a fairly good job of educating its students. But in any field where the curriculum needs to be open-ended and individualized, or where the student needs to be more engaged than just doing what their professor tells them to do, the culture I’ve mentioned hinders the learning environment. In most of the humanities, it’s impossible to objectively measure what success should look like in a degree, so I can only give subjective reasons for why I don’t think it’s a good environment for that.</p>
<p>And many people who even study the sciences and engineering fields will undoubtedly feel the same way, if they’re looking for a more balanced curriculum.</p>
<p>Toronto students probably do have much more of a social life than CalTech students (one of the other schools that is high in those negative PR rankings), but the social life is heterogeneously mixed with their studies rather than being homogeneously connected. In other words, students find ways to socialize in spite of being in an oppressive and otherwise hostile learning environment.</p>
<p>University College is one of the oldest and most beautiful parts of the university (from the outside). It’s not quite as pleasant on the inside, and some of the students living in the dorms live like sewer rats. Victoria College seems to be pretty on both the inside and out. Both are more charming than New College, but I can’t speak to what it’s actually like to live in any of these places.</p>